REPLY FOR GST RETURN MISMATCH NOTICE
Listen to this Article
Return:
Section 2(97) CGST Act 2017
unless the context otherwise requires, the term “return” means any return prescribed or otherwise required to be furnished by or under this Act or the rules made there under.
Rule 61 of CGST ACT
Form and manner of submission of monthly return
Rule 61(5) Where the time limit for furnishing of details in FORM GSTR-1 under section 37 and in FORM GSTR-2 under section 38 has been extended and the circumstances so warrant, the Commissioner may, by notification, [specify the manner and conditions subject to which the] (Substituted for “specify that” vide Notification No. 22/2017 – Central Tax dt 17.08.2017; w.e.f 01.07.2017) return shall be furnished in FORM GSTR-3B electronically through the common portal, either directly or through a Facilitation Centre notified by the Commissioner.
Thus, Form GSTR-3B is also Prescribed u/s 2(97) of CGST Act.
Section 61 (1) of CGST Act 17 : scrutinize the return
The proper officer may scrutinize the return and related particulars furnished by the registered person to verify the correctness of the return and inform him of the discrepancies noticed, if any, in such manner as may be prescribed and seek his explanation thereto.
Rule 99 (1) of CGST Act 17:
He shall issue a notice to the said person in FORM GST ASMT-10, informing him of such discrepancy and seeking his explanation thereto within such time, not exceeding thirty days from the date of service of the notice or such further period as may be permitted by him and also, where possible, quantifying the amount of tax, interest and any other amount payable in relation to such discrepancy.
Section 61 of CGST Act 17:
(2) In case the explanation is found acceptable, the registered person shall be informed accordingly and no further action shall be taken in this regard.
Section 61 (3) of CGST Act 17:
In case no satisfactory explanation is furnished within a period of thirty days of being informed by the proper officer or such further period as may be permitted by him or where the registered person, after accepting the discrepancies, fails to take the corrective measure in his return for the month in which the discrepancy is accepted, the proper officer may initiate appropriate action including those under section 65 (Audit by Tax Authority) or section 66 (Special Audit) or section 67 (Power of Inspection), or proceed to determine the tax and other dues under section 73 or section 74.
Category : GST | Comments : 0 | Hits : 1717
How to Claim GST Refund in India: Complete Step-by-Step Guide Goods and Services Tax (GST) has simplified indirect taxation in India, but claiming a refund can often be confusing for businesses and taxpayers. Whether it’s an export refund, excess payment, or any other type of GST refund, following the correct procedure is essential to avoid delays or rejection. This guide provides a complete, step-by-step process, required documents, common mistakes, and tracking tips for claiming a GST...
GST for Freelancers & Consultants
GST for Freelancers & Consultants During recent times we have witnessed a massive rise in the freelance economy with professionals like designers, writers, consultants, etc offering freelance services. A freelancer is a person who provides his/her professional services on a contractual basis. Under GST, freelancers are treated as service providers. To ensure business legitimacy and ensure growth the GST implications on freelance business needs to be properly understood. In this re...
(This is only for check ) The Goods and Services Tax (GST) framework in India continues to evolve, with the government introducing several important updates aimed at enhancing compliance, improving transparency, and simplifying procedures for taxpayers.
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) Department has recently sent out an advisory to specific GST taxpayers about the first chance given to correct errors in their previously filed GSTR-3B forms. This facility was provided due to discrepancies found between the data stored in the GST system and the data that was actually submitted regarding ITC claims, tax payments, etc. This advisory was sent via registered emails to those taxpayers who are directly affected, and these taxpayers can also see the d...
The Hon’ble Orrisa High Court in the case of Akshya Kumar Sahu v. Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax & Central Excise [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 4644 of 2024 dated February 29, 2024] disposed of the writ petition where Mr. Akshya Kumar Sahu (“the Petitioner”) sought to file an application for revocation of cancellation of registration, but could not file Form GSTR-3B due to suspension of GSTIN. Hence, aggrieved by the circumstances, the...


Comments