Inconsistencies in ITR which need to be avoided for accurate processing of I-T Return
PrintListen to this Article
Data Inconsistency issues which need to be avoided for accurate processing.
1. Set off of brought forward loss claimed, but Schedules BFLA / CFL not filled ……. Year of loss not indicated in CFL.
2. Profit before tax (at serial No. 43 of Sch. P & L Account) differs from Profit from business at serial 1 of Sch. B P
3. Depreciation claimed in Sch. BP – but Sch. DEP / DPM / DOA not filled in / Depreciation debited in Sch. P & L Account not added back in Sl. 11 of Sch. BP.
4. Special benefit for female claimed – Gender in PAN database is Male.
5. MAT credit claimed in Part B-TTI – Schedule MAT C not filled.
6. Loss from business claimed at Sl. No. 1 of sch.- BP, but no loss computed in sch. P & L.
7. Income from business considered twice : Assessee fills both Sch- P & L and Col: 51 (for no- account cases).
8. Loss from House Property claimed in Part B-TI, but the column “ Annual lettable value / Rent received” is left blank in sch. HP (System presumes it as SOP, and allows interest to the extent of Rs.1.5 lakhs).
9. Difference in incomes shown in Part B-TI and the respective Schedules ( Sch. BP / HP / CG / OS etc) .
10. Assessee has not filled up Sl. 4 of Sch. BP – ( for incomes u/s 44AD – 44DA), But has entered the figures in sl. 33(i) to 33(ix) in sch. BP.
11. In Sch. BP Sl. 2 assessee reduces in “Net Profit or loss from speculative business”, but does not fill up Part B. (computation of income from speculative business) in sch. BP.
12. In Sch. Part A-OI, assessee fills in amounts against Sl. No. 6/7/8/9/11 (Any amount debited to P & L account of previous year, but disallowable u/s 36/37/40/40A/43B respectively. But the same are not added back in sch. BP.
13. In Sch. P & L account against Sl. No.3 j (Any other income) assessee enters negative value. System ignores the negative sign and considered it as positive income.
14. Set off of speculation loss against income from non – speculative business.
15. Set off of brought forward HP loss claimed while there is no income from HP in current year.
16. Tax credit claimed in Part B-TTI, without filling up Schedules TDS-1, Schedule TDS-2, and Schedule IT.
17. Deduction u/s 80P claimed – But status information in sch. “Personal information” does not indicate Co-operative Society. 4th character of PAN is for local authority.
18. In Part B-TI – CG loss claimed, but Schedule CG not filled / sale consideration and cost of acquisition not provided.
19. Trust / Society registered u/s 12A using ITR-5.
20. AOP not provided the percentage of shares of members- liable to be taxed at MMR as shares indeterminate.
21. Deductions u/s 80IA, IB, IC etc. Without filling up Schedule.
22. Due date of filing indicated as 30th September. Audit Flag u/s 44AB marked ‘N’.
23. Domestic rate of tax claimed but Domestic status flag set to N.
24. In Sch. CG. STCG (others) have been offered, but in Sch. SI, assessee indicates the same income as STCG (111A). Leads to taxation under both categories.
Category : Income Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 263
Income Tax Alert - Here Are 5 High-Value Transactions That May Come Under Scrutiny. Large Cash Deposits: Any cash deposit exceeding Rs 10 lakh in a financial year across savings accounts draws the attention of the income tax department. Even if deposits are spread across multiple accounts, the cumulative amount beyond the threshold triggers scrutiny. Fixed Deposits: Surpassing the Rs 10-lakh limit in fixed deposits within a financial year prompts inquiries regarding the source of f...
Delhi Court Sentences Woman to 6 months Jail for not filing the return of income (ITR) discussed. Accordingly, the accused is held guilty of not filing the return of income for the assessment year 2014-15 under Section 276CC of The Act. Accordingly, the accused is convicted for an offence punishable under Section 276CC of the Act," the court said in the judgement. "The convict is awarded a sentence of simple imprisonment for six months with a fine of Rs 5,000 and in default to unde...
Corporates, Non-corporates or government department all are procuring major part of services or goods from the MSMEs. There are provision under the Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, to ensure that businesses make payments to MSMEs within a specified time frame, and failure to which can impact the deduction claims for such payments. To facilitate timely payments to micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) and address the challenges faced by these businesses in rec...
In the Income tax act, the words “Turnover”, “Gross receipts” and Sales are used at many places. In the common business parlance, the terms sales and turnover are used interchangeably. However, as per Income Tax law, guidelines are available on the question of what constitutes turnover. Understanding the concepts of these words is necessary for the purpose of the tax audit. An audit is mandatory for corporate assessees, irrespective of the amount of turnover. In ...
Very Important Income Tax Update regarding Micro and Small Enterprises Section 43B-any amount remains unpaid on year end to creditors, being micro/small entity, beyond 45 days or less, as agreed or 15 days if no agmt, shall be added to taxable Income resulting in huge additional tax liability. Keeping such creditors unpaid is risky. If payment for purchases made from *Micro and Small units* remains outstanding on 31st March, there may be huge tax liability. Therefore...
Comments