Like the Central Excise, applications for rectification of mistakes before Tribunal are maintainable under Service tax as well
PrintListen to this Article
Like the Central Excise, applications for rectification of mistakes before Tribunal are maintainable under Service tax as well
We are sharing with you an important judgement of the Hon’ble High Court, Madras, in the case of Fairline Worldwide Express Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry [(2014) 51 taxmann.com 442 (Madras)] on following issue:
Issue:
Whether applications for rectification of mistakes before Tribunal are maintainable under Service tax?
Facts & background:
Fairline Worldwide Express (“the Appellant”) is a Courier agency registered under Service tax engaged in providing services in relation to delivery of documents outside India and claimed the same as an export of service. However, the Lower Authority denied the contentions of the Appellant and confirmed the demand along with imposition of penalty. On appeal being filed to the Commissioner (Appeals), the Commissioner (Appeals) decided the matter in favour of the Appellant.
However, as per the direction of the Committee of Commissioners, the said Order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was appealed by the Department before the Hon’ble CESTAT. The Hon’ble CESTAT by Order dated February 19, 2010, allowed the appeal setting aside the Order of the Commissioner (Appeals).
The Hon’ble Tribunal while deciding the matter in favour of the Revenue relied upon provisions of Rule 3(2) of erstwhile Export of Services Rules, 2005 (“the Export Rules”), as amended from June 16, 2005.
Being aggrieved, the Appellant filled an Miscellaneous petition under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (“the Excise Act”), for rectification of the mistake, in terms of Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 (“the Finance Act”) on the ground that the Order of Hon’ble Tribunal was based on the amendment Act, which came into effect only from June 16, 2005 whereas the period of demand was from March 15, 2005 to June 15, 2005 and therefore, there was an error apparent on record. The Hon’ble Tribunal dismissed the petition on the ground that there is no statutory provision for the Tribunal to entertain the petition for rectification in case of Service tax appeals. Being aggrieved, the Appellant filed an appeal before the Hon’ble High Court of Madras.
Held:
The Hon’ble High Court of Madras held that in view of Section 83 of the Finance Act, Section 35C of Excise Act dealing with filing of applications for rectification of mistakes before Tribunal, is applicable to Service tax also. Hence, the finding of the Tribunal that there is no statutory provision for filing application for rectification in case of Service tax appeals is unsustainable. Accordingly, the matter was remanded back to the Tribunal for disposal of application on merits.
Hope the information will assist you in your Professional endeavors. In case of any query/ information, please do not hesitate to write back to us.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Bimal Jain
FCA, FCS, LLB, B.Com (Hons)
Flat No. 34B, Ground Floor, Pocket - 1,
MayurVihar, Phase - I,
Delhi – 110091, India
Desktel: +91-11-22757595/ 42427056
Mobile: +91 9810604563
Email: bimaljain@hotmail.com
Category : Service Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 163
CENVAT CREDIT ON SET TOP BOX INTRODUCTION Service providers have at least a Telephone in their office. They are paying service tax on the telephone charges. The service tax on telephone charges becomes a part of the cost for the service provider. When he collects service tax from the customer it becomes tax on tax which increases the actual rate of tax payment. This phenomenon of tax on tax is called the cascading effect. The government does not want this to happen. The...
NO KRISHI KALYAN CESS ON DEBTORS AS ON 13th MAY’ 2016 (PART -2) Read more at: http://www.casansaar.com/article-submit.htmlThe enabling provisions for KRISHI KALYAN CESS (KKC) are contained in Chapter – VI of Finance Act’ 2016. As per the provisions, KKC shall be applicable at 0.5% on all taxable services and the proceeds of KKC would be exclusively used for financing initiatives relating to improvement of agriculture and welfare of farmers. The Cess will come into force with ...
As you are aware that the Finance Act, 2016 has increased the service tax rate to include a new cess, namely Krishi Kalyan Cess, which is applicable w.e.f. 01/06/2016. The effective rate of service tax for all new services provided after 01/06/2016 shall be as below: Service Tax ...
CENVAT CREDIT AVAILABLE VS CENVAT CREDIT TAKEN ALARMING AMENDMENT IN RULE 6(3) OF CENVAT CREDIT RULES (a) A manufacturer who manufactures two classes of goods namely:- Non exempted goods removed Exempted goods removed Or (b) a provider of output service who provides two classes of services, namely:- Non Exempted Services Exempted Services Shall follow any one of the following options applicable to him namely:- (i) pay an amount equal to 6% ...
Date : 19.03.2016 M/s. ABC LLP ( Service Provider ) M/s. XYZ Limited ( Service Recipient ) Ref: Service Tax on Works Contract and RCM Opinion Before giving opinion on the issues it will be useful to refer the questions related with this transaction. Assume ABC is LLP and XYZ Ltd is Body Corporate. ABC LLP is a sub contractor of XYZ Limited. XYZ Ltd sub contracted Works Contract work as well as Labor work also some time. Both partie...
Comments