Service Tax - Increase in time limit for availing Cenvat credit on Input services and Inputs
PrintListen to this Article
Increase in time limit for availing Cenvat credit on Input services and Inputs – Whether applicable on invoices issued prior to March 1, 2015?
Till September 1, 2014, there was no time limit prescribed under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 (“the Credit Rules”) for availment of Cenvat credit. Various Courts have held that in the absence of any time limit prescribed under the Credit Rules, Cenvat credit can be taken at any time even in some cases, Assessees have been allowed to avail Cenvat credit even after year(s).
However, effective from September 1, 2014, the said liberty in respect of availment of Cenvat credit has been withdrawn. The Central Board of Excise and Customs (“the CBEC” or “the Board”) vide Notification No. 21 (Applicable w.e.f September 1, 2014), amended Rule 4(1) [for Inputs] and Rule 4(7) [for Input services] of the Credit Rules in order to fix a time limit of 6 months from the date of issue of any of the documents specified in Rule 9(1) thereof, for availment of the Cenvat credit.
In this regard, following are the eligible documents specified under Rule 9(1) of the Credit Rules:
- Invoice issued by a manufacturer, importer, first stage dealer;
- Supplementary invoice by supplier-manufacturer or service provider, except where such payment was on account of fraud, suppression of facts etc.
- Bill of entry;
- A certificate issued by an appraiser of customs in respect of goods imported through a Foreign post office;
- A challan evidencing payment of Service tax, by the service recipient as the person liable to pay Service tax;
- An invoice, a bill or challan issued by a provider of input service on or after the September 10, 2004;
- An invoice, bill or challan issued by an Input Service Distributor under Rule 4A of the Service Tax Rules.
- Taking re-credit in terms of the Credit Rules;
- Invoices issued prior to September 1, 2014;
- Payment of Service tax paid by service recipient under partial reverse charge etc.
Although the Circular on one hand clarifies that purpose of the amendment made by Notification No. 21 is to ensure that after the issuance of a document under Rule 9(1) of the Credit Rules, Cenvat credit is taken for the first time within six months of the issue of the document. Once this condition is met, the limitation has no further application.
However, it is pertinent to note that the Circular in later part further provides that “It is, therefore, clarified that in each of the three situations described above pertaining to Rule 4(7), Rule 3(5B) or Rule 4(5)(a) of CCR, 2004, the limitation of six months would apply when the credit is taken for the first time on an eligible document”
Thus, even though the CBEC has clarified non-applicability of six months’ time limit while availing re-credit in terms of the Credit Rules but, there are certain other issues still existing in this regard, which were left unexplained by the Board.
Now, with extension of time limit for availment of Cenvat credit from 6 months to 1 year (supra) w.e.f 1st March, 2015, the same issue may still crop up again as to whether the Assessee would be eligible avail Cenvat credit on Invoices issued prior to March 1, 2015 for which time period of 6 months expired but 1 year period is open on March 1, 2015.
Conclusion: The Board is required to clarify the matter at the earliest keeping in mind the very purpose of introduction of the Cenvat credit scheme i.e. not to collect duty on duty and avoid cascading effect.
Hope the information will assist you in your Professional endeavors. In case of any query/ information, please do not hesitate to write back to us.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Bimal Jain
FCA, FCS, LLB, B.Com (Hons)
Delhi:
Flat No. 34B, Ground Floor, Pocket - 1,
Mayur Vihar, Phase - I,
Delhi – 110091, India
Desktel: +91-11-22757595/ 42427056
Mobile: +91 9810604563
Email: bimaljain@hotmail.com
Category : Service Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 951
CENVAT CREDIT ON SET TOP BOX INTRODUCTION Service providers have at least a Telephone in their office. They are paying service tax on the telephone charges. The service tax on telephone charges becomes a part of the cost for the service provider. When he collects service tax from the customer it becomes tax on tax which increases the actual rate of tax payment. This phenomenon of tax on tax is called the cascading effect. The government does not want this to happen. The...
NO KRISHI KALYAN CESS ON DEBTORS AS ON 13th MAY’ 2016 (PART -2) Read more at: http://www.casansaar.com/article-submit.htmlThe enabling provisions for KRISHI KALYAN CESS (KKC) are contained in Chapter – VI of Finance Act’ 2016. As per the provisions, KKC shall be applicable at 0.5% on all taxable services and the proceeds of KKC would be exclusively used for financing initiatives relating to improvement of agriculture and welfare of farmers. The Cess will come into force with ...
As you are aware that the Finance Act, 2016 has increased the service tax rate to include a new cess, namely Krishi Kalyan Cess, which is applicable w.e.f. 01/06/2016. The effective rate of service tax for all new services provided after 01/06/2016 shall be as below: Service Tax ...
CENVAT CREDIT AVAILABLE VS CENVAT CREDIT TAKEN ALARMING AMENDMENT IN RULE 6(3) OF CENVAT CREDIT RULES (a) A manufacturer who manufactures two classes of goods namely:- Non exempted goods removed Exempted goods removed Or (b) a provider of output service who provides two classes of services, namely:- Non Exempted Services Exempted Services Shall follow any one of the following options applicable to him namely:- (i) pay an amount equal to 6% ...
Date : 19.03.2016 M/s. ABC LLP ( Service Provider ) M/s. XYZ Limited ( Service Recipient ) Ref: Service Tax on Works Contract and RCM Opinion Before giving opinion on the issues it will be useful to refer the questions related with this transaction. Assume ABC is LLP and XYZ Ltd is Body Corporate. ABC LLP is a sub contractor of XYZ Limited. XYZ Ltd sub contracted Works Contract work as well as Labor work also some time. Both partie...
Comments