Service Tax on SIM Cards
Listen to this Article
In this article an attempt has been made to consolidate the important developments of service tax law on taxability of SIM card transactions
- Amount received for subscription of SIM card is exigible to service tax only
The charges paid by the subscribers for procuring a SIM Card are generally processing charges for activating the cellular phone and consequently the same would necessarily be included in the value of the SIM Card. [Para 18]
The position in law is therefore clear that the amount received by the cellular telephone company from its subscribers towards SIM Card will form part of the taxable value for levy of service tax, for the SIM Cards are never sold as goods independent from services provided. They are considered part and parcel of the services provided and the dominant position of the transaction is to provide services and not to sell the material i.e., SIM Cards which on its own but without the service would hardly have any value at all. Thus, it is established from the records and facts of this case that the value of SIM cards forms part of the activation charges as no activation is possible without a valid functioning of SIM card and the value of the taxable service is calculated on the gross total amount received by the operator from the subscribers. [Para 19]
[Supreme Court Judgment in Idea Mobile Communication Ltd [2011] 12 taxmann.com 307 (SC) AUGUST 4, 2011]
- Taxable Value of service in case of SIM card
- Supreme Court on taxable Value of service in case of SIM card: In BPL Mobile Cellular Ltd 01-02-2008, it was held by Supreme Court in [2012] 26 taxmann.com 216 (SC) that in case of subscription of SIM cards telecom service providers are liable to pay tax service tax on amount received from distributors and not on MRP
- Service tax imposed on MRP
With effect from 1-3-2007, an Explanation was inserted below rule 5(1) of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006, providing that, the value of telecommunication service shall be the gross amount paid by the person to whom telecom service is provided by the telegraph authority.
Thus, the gross amount paid by the subscriber viz. the MRP of the SIM Cards shall be the basis of the valuation and the telecom service providers shall be liable to service tax thereon
- Liability of Selling agents/Distributers of SIM Cards
The selling agent/distributor does not provide any service to the customer. In some cases the distributor gets his consideration from customer at the time of sale of sim cards through the margin in price. In some cases the distributor gets their consideration from the telecom operator by way of commission on the transaction normally called as sale. In the case before us the second type of situation exists.[Para 13 of G.R.Movers (Del. Cestat)]
Though the correct procedure for discharge of the service tax liability by the two parties is that the distributors raise bills for commissions that is due to them along with service tax and BSNL takes Cenvat credit of tax paid by distributors for discharging liability on the telecommunication service provided by BSNL, such procedure does not result in extra realization of Revenue. [Para 26 of G.R.Movers (Del. Cestat)]
It was held by the Cestat that
| (i) | Chetan Traders v. CCE [2008] 17 STT 318 (New Delhi-CESTAT) | |
| (ii) | Hindustan Associated Traders v. CCE [Final order Nos. 673 & 674 of 2007, dated 7-6-2007] | |
| (iii) | South East Corpn. v. CCE& ST [2009] 22 STT 446 (Bang.-CESTAT) | |
| (iv) | Karakattu Communications v. CCE [2009] 21 STT 384 (Bang.-CESTAT) | |
Madras High Court in Bharat Cell [2015] 62 taxmann.com 295 (Madras) JULY 3, 2015 has followed the Judgment of Delhi Cestat in G.R. Movers (supra)
However , the services of selling agent or a distributor of SIM cards or recharge coupon vouchers have been exempted from service tax vide entry No. 29 in Notification 25/2012-S.T., dated 20.06.2012.w.e.f. 01-07-2012
- Conclusion: The Concept of revenue neutrality discussed in G.R. Movers (supra) can not be followed as a precedent in other cases and the judgements delivered are in the light of special nature of transaction, valuation method under service tax law and future exemption to selling agent/distributors of SIM cards.
Category : Service Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 707
CENVAT CREDIT ON SET TOP BOX INTRODUCTION Service providers have at least a Telephone in their office. They are paying service tax on the telephone charges. The service tax on telephone charges becomes a part of the cost for the service provider. When he collects service tax from the customer it becomes tax on tax which increases the actual rate of tax payment. This phenomenon of tax on tax is called the cascading effect. The government does not want this to happen. The...
NO KRISHI KALYAN CESS ON DEBTORS AS ON 13th MAY’ 2016 (PART -2) Read more at: http://www.casansaar.com/article-submit.htmlThe enabling provisions for KRISHI KALYAN CESS (KKC) are contained in Chapter – VI of Finance Act’ 2016. As per the provisions, KKC shall be applicable at 0.5% on all taxable services and the proceeds of KKC would be exclusively used for financing initiatives relating to improvement of agriculture and welfare of farmers. The Cess will come into force with ...
As you are aware that the Finance Act, 2016 has increased the service tax rate to include a new cess, namely Krishi Kalyan Cess, which is applicable w.e.f. 01/06/2016. The effective rate of service tax for all new services provided after 01/06/2016 shall be as below: Service Tax ...
CENVAT CREDIT AVAILABLE VS CENVAT CREDIT TAKEN ALARMING AMENDMENT IN RULE 6(3) OF CENVAT CREDIT RULES (a) A manufacturer who manufactures two classes of goods namely:- Non exempted goods removed Exempted goods removed Or (b) a provider of output service who provides two classes of services, namely:- Non Exempted Services Exempted Services Shall follow any one of the following options applicable to him namely:- (i) pay an amount equal to 6% ...
Date : 19.03.2016 M/s. ABC LLP ( Service Provider ) M/s. XYZ Limited ( Service Recipient ) Ref: Service Tax on Works Contract and RCM Opinion Before giving opinion on the issues it will be useful to refer the questions related with this transaction. Assume ABC is LLP and XYZ Ltd is Body Corporate. ABC LLP is a sub contractor of XYZ Limited. XYZ Ltd sub contracted Works Contract work as well as Labor work also some time. Both partie...


Comments