Service recipient is required to reimburse Service Tax paid by the Service provider
Listen to this Article
Dear Professional Colleague,
Service recipient is required to reimburse Service Tax paid by the Service provider
We are sharing with you an important judgement of the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of M/s Bhagwati Security Services (Regd.) Versus Union of India [2013 (11) TMI 649] on the following issue:
Issue:
Whether the service provider can get the reimbursement of service tax already paid by him, from the service recipient?
Facts of the case:
M/S. Bhagwati Security Services (Regd.), the Petitioner (“the Assessee” or “the Company”) was providing security services under the service Agreement (“the Agreement”) to BSNL. The Company deposited service tax to the Department on the basis of demand raised by the authorities. Thereafter, the Company applied for reimbursement of service tax from BSNL, which was denied on the ground that the same was not provided in the Agreement. The Company filed petition in the High Court.
Held:
The Hon’ble High Court after going through the Agreement and other legal provisions of the Finance Act and rules thereof held that:
- Service tax is statutory liability. It is a tax which is required to be collected by the service provider from the person to whom service is provided, and thereafter to be deposited with Government treasury within the prescribed time.
- Thus, essentially the statute is being imposing the tax upon the person to whom service is being provided and the service provider is merely a collecting agency.
- BSNL (i.e. service recipient) directed to make reimbursement of service tax to the petitioner without further delay.
Hope the information will assist you in your Professional endeavors. In case of any query/ information, please do not hesitate to write back to us.
Bimal Jain
FCA, FCS, LLB, B.Com (Hons)
F-30/31/32, Pankaj Grand Plaza
1st Floor, Mayur Vihar, Phase–I,
Delhi – 110091 (India)
Mobile: +91 9810604563
E-mail: bimaljain@hotmail.com
Disclaimer: The contents of this document are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the authors nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this document nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
Readers are advised to consult the professional for understanding applicability of this newsletter in the respective scenarios. While due care has been taken in preparing this document, the existence of mistakes and omissions herein is not ruled out. No part of this document should be distributed or copied (except for personal, non-commercial use) without our written permission.
Category : Service Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 635
CENVAT CREDIT ON SET TOP BOX INTRODUCTION Service providers have at least a Telephone in their office. They are paying service tax on the telephone charges. The service tax on telephone charges becomes a part of the cost for the service provider. When he collects service tax from the customer it becomes tax on tax which increases the actual rate of tax payment. This phenomenon of tax on tax is called the cascading effect. The government does not want this to happen. The...
NO KRISHI KALYAN CESS ON DEBTORS AS ON 13th MAY’ 2016 (PART -2) Read more at: http://www.casansaar.com/article-submit.htmlThe enabling provisions for KRISHI KALYAN CESS (KKC) are contained in Chapter – VI of Finance Act’ 2016. As per the provisions, KKC shall be applicable at 0.5% on all taxable services and the proceeds of KKC would be exclusively used for financing initiatives relating to improvement of agriculture and welfare of farmers. The Cess will come into force with ...
As you are aware that the Finance Act, 2016 has increased the service tax rate to include a new cess, namely Krishi Kalyan Cess, which is applicable w.e.f. 01/06/2016. The effective rate of service tax for all new services provided after 01/06/2016 shall be as below: Service Tax ...
CENVAT CREDIT AVAILABLE VS CENVAT CREDIT TAKEN ALARMING AMENDMENT IN RULE 6(3) OF CENVAT CREDIT RULES (a) A manufacturer who manufactures two classes of goods namely:- Non exempted goods removed Exempted goods removed Or (b) a provider of output service who provides two classes of services, namely:- Non Exempted Services Exempted Services Shall follow any one of the following options applicable to him namely:- (i) pay an amount equal to 6% ...
Date : 19.03.2016 M/s. ABC LLP ( Service Provider ) M/s. XYZ Limited ( Service Recipient ) Ref: Service Tax on Works Contract and RCM Opinion Before giving opinion on the issues it will be useful to refer the questions related with this transaction. Assume ABC is LLP and XYZ Ltd is Body Corporate. ABC LLP is a sub contractor of XYZ Limited. XYZ Ltd sub contracted Works Contract work as well as Labor work also some time. Both partie...


Comments