Duplication in input tax credit major source of misuse in VAT

Posted Date : 14-Mar-2011 , 12:41:33 pm | Posted By CASANSAAR print

Listen to this Article

0:00

Value Added Tax is widely believed to be a tax which is not so evasion prone because of the audit trail that it creates. However, this audit trail is not so much easy to pursue mainly because of very voluminous records of input credit that are to be checked.

Unless it is supplemented by action on the basis of intelligence reports, merely routine check of documents do not reveal the misuse of input tax credit resorted to by the manufacturers and dealers. The occurrence of frequent misuses led to the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) to tighten the check as well as to introduce the measure of debarring the manufacturers from availing of this system of input tax credit for a certain period.

In a recent case (NCR Corporation Indian Pvt Ltd vs. Member, CBEC -2010(259)ELT663(Mad.), the Madras High Court has upheld that the duplication in the entry of credit of nearly Rs 2 crore was a deliberate act which attracted the punishment as in the notification No.32/2006 dated 30-12-2006. The High Court noted that this notification was issued to prevent the violation of such misuse and the manufacturer could not take the plea that it was just a mistake due to a very large number of input tax credits taken per month. This mistake was not detected by their internal audit though the audit was already completed.

It was detected by the Department on the basis of intelligence report. The notification No.32/2006 has laid down certain procedure which is quite elaborate so that ultimate decision is taken by the CBEC. If the CBEC is convinced that the manufacturer is knowingly involved in committing the offence of taking the same credit twice or similar fraudulent actions for evading duty, it can debar the manufacturer from availing of the facility of Cenvat Credit for a certain period and also from availing of the facility of paying duty on a monthly basis. In that case the manufacturer has to pay the duty on a daily basis. In this case when an order was passed by the CBEC to take action under the above notification, the action was upheld by the Madras High Court.

The misuse of duplication in the availing of duplicate cre-dit on the basis of the same invoice is more common than records show. Even on the basis of checking of monthly statements many such cases of misuse have been found. In a study which was made by the NIPFP, nearly 14 years ago, it was found that nearly in 6 per cent of total detections, there were substantial fraud committed by the manufacturers. They were of the following types; (i) Credit without producing documents, (ii) Credit on invoice without physical movement, (iii) Credit on extra/Xerox copy of invoice (iv) Credit availed twice on same invoice (v) Credit availed without payment of duty and (vi) Fraud/fake documents, etc. No recent data are available but the frequent occurrence of such cases must have prom-pted the CBEC to issue the notification for taking action against such fraud. There are some other interesting but devastating examples of misuse by duplication of clearan-ces. In one case simply two zeros were added some 34 times. This led to loss of nearly Rs 34 crore of revenue. It was detected by the Government audit and the manufacturer’s plea was that it was a mistake by the clerk.

Such deception could be uncovered by comparing for every transaction, the invoice submitted to the tax administration by the seller with that submitted by the buyer. Matching up invoices for all transactions for every VAT firm is an enormous task, even with the aid of computers. The use of false invoices to abuse the credit (Carl S Shoup – Choosing among Types of VAT, p.9 in Value Added Taxation in Developing Countries edited by Malcolm Gillis et al, World Bank 1990) system is the type of fraud under a VAT that is different from and more sophisticated than fraud under other indirect taxes (Liam Ebrill et al – The Modern VAT, p.60, IMF 2001).

Sukumar Mukhopadhyay on ET

Category : VAT | Comments : 0 | Hits : 857

Also Read - MVAT Audit Report in Form e-704

Introduction Regular audits are essential to ensure compliance and transparency in taxation. The new VAT Audit Form — 704 has brought out many major changes that are important for companies operating under the Sales Tax Act. The Maharashtra Value Added Tax Rules introduced this complete form with the objective of reducing the audit procedure and improving the effectiveness of tax administration. In this article, we’ll go into detail about the new VAT Audit Form 704, includin...

Also Read - Assessee cannot be asked to reverse input tax credit due to non-payment of taxes by the selling dealer

Sri Lakshmi Textiles Vs. the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Others [2016 (1) TMI 329 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] Facts: Sri Lakshmi Textiles(“the Petitioner”) is a partnership firm engaged in the business of inner garments and textiles registered under Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 (“TN Vat Act”). The Petitioner was regularly filing the VAT return and paying the VAT liability after adjusting the corresponding input tax credit. For the Assessment Year 2013-2014, th...

Also Read - ONLINE DVAT REGISTRATION : -- MANDATORY OR VOLUNTARY WHAT TO APPLY ??

Now days for Trading goods online via. Flipkart , Amazon , Snapdeal , Shopclues etc. every dealer is required by such e commerce sites to obtain DVAT registration certificate so as to enroll themselves as dealer on such e commerce sites. In that case, If a person is willing to start new business then he shall apply for voluntary registration otherwise Mandatory registration. Let me tell you the difference between Mandatory & Voluntary registration Mandatory ...

Also Read - Registration under Gujarat VAT TIN and CST TIN - A Common Man's Guide - Part I of Series 10 on 10

A lot of queries comes to mind when one thinks about taking registration under Gujarat VAT and CST Laws. Some of the queries and their answers are published as follows for the benefits of the readers: What is VAT / CST / TIN / Sales Tax ? Answer: VAT means Value Added Tax On Sales. CST means Central Sales Tax. TIN means Tax Identification Number. And Sales Tax is Tax on Sales. In a Summarized way, in any State Law, two types of registrations are available. Fir...

Also Read - Supply to high seas vessel is liable to VAT if any territorial nexus exist in the State

Supply to high seas vessel is liable to VAT if any territorial nexus exist in the State Raj Shipping Vs. State of Maharashtra [2015 (62) taxmann.com 309 (Bombay)] In the instant case, Raj Shipping (“the Petitioner”) was engaged in "Bunker Supplies" which mainly consisted of supply of High Speed Diesel Oil (“HSD”) to various incoming and outgoing vessels within or beyond the port limits of Mumbai port. The Petitioner was not paying Sales tax on supply of HS...

Comments

You need to be logged in to post comment

No Record Found.

Duplication in input tax credit major source of misuse in VAT

Comments

Trending Articles