SC dismisses plea for ban on Whatsapp and other messaging Apps
PrintListen to this Article
0:00
0:00
The Supreme Court today dismissed a plea seeking ban on WhatsApp and other communication applications on security grounds and claiming that these services violated the law.
The bench headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur and A M Khanwilkar, however, granted liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate authority in the government with his grievances.
It said the petitioner could also approachTelecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) with his plea.
During the hearing the bench did not go into the submissions that the message service applications like WhatsApp's end-to-end encryption feature poses a security risk to the country.
Petitioner Sudhir Yadav appearing in person said these messenger services violated the provisions of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, and Information Technology Act, 2000.
Other than WhatsApp, the petitioner had also named over dozen other messaging platforms like Hike, Viber, Signal, Telegram and Secure chat. "Even if WhatsApp was asked to break through an individual's message to hand over the data to the government, it too would fail as it does not have the decryption keys either," the petitioner said.
In his petition, Yadav said that terrorists and criminals could easily communicate on WhatsApp and make plans which are impossible to access even by supercomputers as decrypting a single 256-bit encrypted message would take hundreds of years.
In an update in April, WhatsApp introuduced 256-bit encryption for all its users. In his petition, he said that this was similar to what the government had insisted vis-a-vis Blackberry as well.#casansaar (PTI - Economic Times)
The bench headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur and A M Khanwilkar, however, granted liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate authority in the government with his grievances.
It said the petitioner could also approachTelecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) with his plea.
During the hearing the bench did not go into the submissions that the message service applications like WhatsApp's end-to-end encryption feature poses a security risk to the country.
Petitioner Sudhir Yadav appearing in person said these messenger services violated the provisions of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, and Information Technology Act, 2000.
Other than WhatsApp, the petitioner had also named over dozen other messaging platforms like Hike, Viber, Signal, Telegram and Secure chat. "Even if WhatsApp was asked to break through an individual's message to hand over the data to the government, it too would fail as it does not have the decryption keys either," the petitioner said.
In his petition, Yadav said that terrorists and criminals could easily communicate on WhatsApp and make plans which are impossible to access even by supercomputers as decrypting a single 256-bit encrypted message would take hundreds of years.
In an update in April, WhatsApp introuduced 256-bit encryption for all its users. In his petition, he said that this was similar to what the government had insisted vis-a-vis Blackberry as well.#casansaar (PTI - Economic Times)
Category : General | Comments : 0 | Hits : 620
Also Read -
India Features in World Bank’s Top Five Rankings for Private Investment in Infrastructure
Infrastructure remains a cornerstone of India’s long-term growth framework, with public capital expenditure maintaining a consistent upward momentum since FY15. A defining development in th...
Also Read -
India's FY26 GDP Growth Projected at 7.4%, Supported by Strong Consumption and Investment Momentum
India’s economy is projected to expand by 7.4 per cent in FY26, supported by the twin drivers of consumption and investment, reinforcing its position as the world’s fastest-growing major e...
Retirement fund body EPFO has said it will no longer use Aadhaar as a valid document for proof of date of birth. In an official circular on January 16, the Employees' Provident Fund Org...
Comments