SC asks Centre to curb illegal operations of multinational auditors
PrintListen to this Article
0:00
0:00
The Supreme Court took serious note of alleged illegal operations of multi-national accounting firms (MAFs) in India in collaboration with Indian Chartered Accountancy firms (ICAFs) and asked the Centre on Friday to examine steps to rein them in.
"The Union of India may constitute a three-member committee of experts to look into the question whether, and to what extent, the statutory framework to enforce the letter and spirit of Sections 25 and 29 of Chartered Accountants Act and the statutory code of conduct for CAs requires revisit so as to appropriately discipline and regulate MAFs," a bench of Justices Adarsh Kumar Goel and Uday Umesh Lalit ordered.
The order issued by the apex court directed the Union government to constitute a three-member committee of experts to scrutinize the existing regulatory regime and propose changes if required.
The ruling comes at a time when the role of auditors is already under scrutiny for their failure to detect the Rs11,400 crore fraud allegedly perpetuated by group firms of jewellers Nirav Modi and Mehul Choksi in collusion with officials of state-run Punjab National Bank (PNB).
“Financial statements audited by qualified auditors are acted upon and failures of the auditors have resulted into scandals in the past. The auditing profession requires proper oversight,” the court observed.
The committee has to be set up within two months and will thereafter be required to submit its findings to the Supreme Court in three months.
While the order made clear that framing a policy was the domain of the executive, the judiciary was perfectly within its rights to examine whether policy safeguards are in place and implemented.
The order was passed in a plea by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL), a non-profit organization, seeking a probe into allegations of FDI violations and malpractices by UK-based audit firm PricewaterhouseCoopers Pvt. Ltd (PwC) and its associated companies.
PwC did not respond to emails seeking comment.
The order was delivered by a bench comprising justices Adarsh Kumar Goel and U.U. Lalit.
Ongoing investigation by the Enforcement Directorate into allegations of violations and malpractices by PwC have to be completed within three months.
Setting out the terms of reference of the expert group, the Supreme Court order said it would need to consider the need for an appropriate legislation or mechanism to govern the profession of auditors.
Apart from calling for suggestions from concerned authorities, it may also consider steps for effective enforcement of the provisions of the FDI policy and the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, the order said.
CPIL, in its petition, had contended that there was a huge inflow of money due to FDI violations by PwC and other firms under its umbrella.
It further alleged that improper certification was being granted to auditors by the firms and payments worth hundreds of crores were being directed by way of subsidies, export incentives, grants etc., causing loss to the exchequer.
“The primary objective of an audit is to lend credence to the financial statements for conformance to accounting standards, presentation and disclosures, and not towards detection of all frauds. For detecting frauds, forensic audit would need to be carried out,” said Kamlesh Vikamsey, former president of Institute of the Chartered Accountants of India.
“The primary objective of an audit is to lend credence to the financial statements for conformance to accounting standards, presentation and disclosures, and not towards detection of all frauds. For detecting frauds, forensic audit would need to be carried out,” said Vikamsey. #casansaar (Source - PTI, LiveMint)
"The Union of India may constitute a three-member committee of experts to look into the question whether, and to what extent, the statutory framework to enforce the letter and spirit of Sections 25 and 29 of Chartered Accountants Act and the statutory code of conduct for CAs requires revisit so as to appropriately discipline and regulate MAFs," a bench of Justices Adarsh Kumar Goel and Uday Umesh Lalit ordered.
The order issued by the apex court directed the Union government to constitute a three-member committee of experts to scrutinize the existing regulatory regime and propose changes if required.
The ruling comes at a time when the role of auditors is already under scrutiny for their failure to detect the Rs11,400 crore fraud allegedly perpetuated by group firms of jewellers Nirav Modi and Mehul Choksi in collusion with officials of state-run Punjab National Bank (PNB).
“Financial statements audited by qualified auditors are acted upon and failures of the auditors have resulted into scandals in the past. The auditing profession requires proper oversight,” the court observed.
The committee has to be set up within two months and will thereafter be required to submit its findings to the Supreme Court in three months.
While the order made clear that framing a policy was the domain of the executive, the judiciary was perfectly within its rights to examine whether policy safeguards are in place and implemented.
The order was passed in a plea by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL), a non-profit organization, seeking a probe into allegations of FDI violations and malpractices by UK-based audit firm PricewaterhouseCoopers Pvt. Ltd (PwC) and its associated companies.
PwC did not respond to emails seeking comment.
The order was delivered by a bench comprising justices Adarsh Kumar Goel and U.U. Lalit.
Ongoing investigation by the Enforcement Directorate into allegations of violations and malpractices by PwC have to be completed within three months.
Setting out the terms of reference of the expert group, the Supreme Court order said it would need to consider the need for an appropriate legislation or mechanism to govern the profession of auditors.
Apart from calling for suggestions from concerned authorities, it may also consider steps for effective enforcement of the provisions of the FDI policy and the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, the order said.
CPIL, in its petition, had contended that there was a huge inflow of money due to FDI violations by PwC and other firms under its umbrella.
It further alleged that improper certification was being granted to auditors by the firms and payments worth hundreds of crores were being directed by way of subsidies, export incentives, grants etc., causing loss to the exchequer.
“The primary objective of an audit is to lend credence to the financial statements for conformance to accounting standards, presentation and disclosures, and not towards detection of all frauds. For detecting frauds, forensic audit would need to be carried out,” said Kamlesh Vikamsey, former president of Institute of the Chartered Accountants of India.
“The primary objective of an audit is to lend credence to the financial statements for conformance to accounting standards, presentation and disclosures, and not towards detection of all frauds. For detecting frauds, forensic audit would need to be carried out,” said Vikamsey. #casansaar (Source - PTI, LiveMint)
Category : Auditing | Comments : 1 | Hits : 1213
In a boost to the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA), the regulator for auditors and audit firms dealing with large and listed companies, the Supreme Court has upheld an order by the Nation...
Hindustan Unilever Ltd. has announced that its cost auditor has been disqualified from continuing amid a conflict of interest. The decision was made after it was discovered that Rasesh Vipin ...
The Bombay High Court has granted bail to Anita Kirdat, a former concurrent auditor of the Punjab and Maharashtra Cooperative (PMC) Bank, in connection with a multi-crore loan fraud case. Kirdat, 4...
Comments
KAPIL MITTAL
26-Feb-2018 , 04:05:16 pmPWC though it is tainted for improper auditing in satyam fraud case, it had been appointed for investigating the PNB Frauds ???? No body questions them. Only big 4 are there and no other CA firms or CAs are there. In fact frauds were not that much before entry of big 4s in legal manner