SC to Govt-Why can't RBI accept scrapped notes till March 31
PrintListen to this Article
0:00
0:00
The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the Centre to file a response to a plea challenging the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) refusal to accept demonetized Rs500 and Rs1,000 notes post 31 December, 2016.
A bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) J.S. Khehar gave the government two weeks to file a response.
The petitioners—three individuals and Victory Logitrans Pvt. Ltd, a Bengaluru-based transport company—claimed that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had in his speech on 7 November said that any person who is unable to deposit the old banknotes before 31 December 2016 can do so at specific branches of RBI up to 31 March, 2017.
“The PM’s speech is irrelevant,” the government’s top law officer, attorney general Mukul Rohatgi, said.
He argued that the statutory notification issued on 8 November, 2016 had been superseded by a later ordinance issued on 30 December.
Also Read | How sticky are cash deposits made in banks as a result of demonetisation?
“The notification does not create any rights and is anyway replaced by the ordinance,” Rohatgi said.
“Everyone knew the PM’s speech but nobody saw the ordinance coming,” the court said in an oral observation.
In an earlier hearing, the government had sought to argue the case directly without filing a reply to claims made in the petition.
As per its ‘facility for exchange of specified bank notes during the grace period’ notification dated 31 December 2016, the RBI stated that old banknotes could be exchanged only by those who were not in India between 8 November and 31 December 2016.
It also fixed a Rs25,000 cap for non-resident Indians to deposit scrapped currency.
The case will be heard next on 11 April.#casansaar (PTI - LiveMint)
A bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) J.S. Khehar gave the government two weeks to file a response.
The petitioners—three individuals and Victory Logitrans Pvt. Ltd, a Bengaluru-based transport company—claimed that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had in his speech on 7 November said that any person who is unable to deposit the old banknotes before 31 December 2016 can do so at specific branches of RBI up to 31 March, 2017.
“The PM’s speech is irrelevant,” the government’s top law officer, attorney general Mukul Rohatgi, said.
He argued that the statutory notification issued on 8 November, 2016 had been superseded by a later ordinance issued on 30 December.
Also Read | How sticky are cash deposits made in banks as a result of demonetisation?
“The notification does not create any rights and is anyway replaced by the ordinance,” Rohatgi said.
“Everyone knew the PM’s speech but nobody saw the ordinance coming,” the court said in an oral observation.
In an earlier hearing, the government had sought to argue the case directly without filing a reply to claims made in the petition.
As per its ‘facility for exchange of specified bank notes during the grace period’ notification dated 31 December 2016, the RBI stated that old banknotes could be exchanged only by those who were not in India between 8 November and 31 December 2016.
It also fixed a Rs25,000 cap for non-resident Indians to deposit scrapped currency.
The case will be heard next on 11 April.#casansaar (PTI - LiveMint)
Category : RBI | Comments : 0 | Hits : 494
The Supreme Court on Friday set aside the rejection of an IRS officer’s candidature for appointment as a member of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), ruling that the involvement of the th...
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Friday unveiled a set of liquidity-boosting measures aimed at infusing more than $23 billion (around ₹2 lakh crore) into the banking system, after review...
RBI has issued draft rules to tighten dividend payouts by banks by linking distributions to capital adequacy, asset and profit quality, setting a uniform prudential framework effective from FY27. In t...
Comments