News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
Reliance Capital to file Rs 10,000 cr defamation suit against its former auditor PwC
First, the statutory auditors resign claiming the company did not provide satisfactory answers to their queries. Then the company’s shares nosedive. Now the company is suing the auditors for false claims and damaging the company’s reputation. This is the story between Price Waterhouse & Co (PwC) and Reliance Capital, a company within the Anil Ambani led Group. The claim for damages? Rs 10,000 crore! Not just that, some shareholders of the company are separately taking on the world-renowned audit firm with a class action suit for the loss the auditors’ actions and statements have caused them.
Reliance Capital claims it has obtained opinions from its current auditor as well as independent legal firms that there was no wrongdoing on its part and that the irregularities in its books as pointed out by PwC do not exist. It appears Reliance Capital had sent these opinions to the auditors to respond but got no reply. This is the reason for this legal suit for damages.
The story began in June this year when PwC sent a letter to the Ministry of Company Affairs that they are invoking the provisions of section 143 (12) of the Companies Act and are quitting as auditors of two companies, Reliance Capital and Reliance Home Finance. Now, this particular clause implies that the company has committed some financial irregularity and when the auditors asked for details or explanations, the management did not provide them a satisfactory reply.
Subsequently, Reliance Capital sought a legal opinion and has managed to receive the opinions in its favour as stated above. The company’s board has since met and decided to haul PwC to court and ask it to pay Rs 10,000 crore as compensation for the damages caused. The wordings used are “defamation, reputation loss and also a massive loss to shareholders of the company”.
The class action suit under section 245 of the Companies Act 2013 is being planned by some section of the shareholders of both the companies and the promoters can become parties to that suit later. They are claiming that the shares of Reliance Capital and Reliance Home Finance fell 48% and 58% respectively, as soon as the auditors resigned. Now, if the auditors’ version is being proved as false then the shareholders will argue that the loss they incurred on the bourses were deliberately caused by the auditors.
It is also learnt that both sides have engaged some top law firms to fight the legal battle.
The IL&FS fiasco has opened up a can of worms as far as the audit firms are concerned. All the big four, viz. KPMG, PwC, Deloitte and EY appear to be involved in one way or the other in hiding the financial misdemeanours of the companies and not flagging such irregularities in their audit reports. #casansaar (Source - The News Mint)
Reliance Capital claims it has obtained opinions from its current auditor as well as independent legal firms that there was no wrongdoing on its part and that the irregularities in its books as pointed out by PwC do not exist. It appears Reliance Capital had sent these opinions to the auditors to respond but got no reply. This is the reason for this legal suit for damages.
The story began in June this year when PwC sent a letter to the Ministry of Company Affairs that they are invoking the provisions of section 143 (12) of the Companies Act and are quitting as auditors of two companies, Reliance Capital and Reliance Home Finance. Now, this particular clause implies that the company has committed some financial irregularity and when the auditors asked for details or explanations, the management did not provide them a satisfactory reply.
Subsequently, Reliance Capital sought a legal opinion and has managed to receive the opinions in its favour as stated above. The company’s board has since met and decided to haul PwC to court and ask it to pay Rs 10,000 crore as compensation for the damages caused. The wordings used are “defamation, reputation loss and also a massive loss to shareholders of the company”.
The class action suit under section 245 of the Companies Act 2013 is being planned by some section of the shareholders of both the companies and the promoters can become parties to that suit later. They are claiming that the shares of Reliance Capital and Reliance Home Finance fell 48% and 58% respectively, as soon as the auditors resigned. Now, if the auditors’ version is being proved as false then the shareholders will argue that the loss they incurred on the bourses were deliberately caused by the auditors.
It is also learnt that both sides have engaged some top law firms to fight the legal battle.
The IL&FS fiasco has opened up a can of worms as far as the audit firms are concerned. All the big four, viz. KPMG, PwC, Deloitte and EY appear to be involved in one way or the other in hiding the financial misdemeanours of the companies and not flagging such irregularities in their audit reports. #casansaar (Source - The News Mint)
Category : Auditing | Comments : 0 | Hits : 647
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments