High Court notice to government over disqualification of shell companies' directors
PrintListen to this Article
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs, last month, identified 1,06,578 directors of shell companies for disqualification.
While issuing notices to the ministry, the HC also stayed the disqualification of three such directors.
Advocate Manish Jain, counsel for the petitioners, challenged the vires, Latin for powers, of Section 164 (2) of Companies Act, 2013 which was notified in the year 2014.
Jain said that the section was wholly ambiguous, as it is unclear as to whether it is applicable only to existing directors or extends to all those who no longer are directors of the disputed shell companies.
“The vires of the section in question has been challenged,” Jain told ET. He argued that the ministry had violated the principles of natural justice in disqualifying the directors. For, he contended, the directors were not even issued show-cause notices before disqualifying them.
The petitioners have also contended that there was no provision under Section 164 (2) of Companies Act, 2013 for “immediate disqualification” of a director.
Jain said the section is “unconstitutional”, as it is apparently applicable even to those directors who were not the directors of defaulting companies at the time of default and have vacated or quit the officer prior to the default.
The government recently de-recognised 2.10 lakh companies that were dormant and utilised for dubious transactions. After de-recognition, the finance ministry directed banks to restrict operations of bank accounts of such companies by their directors or authorised representatives.
The ministry is further analysing the data of these companies from the Registrar of Companies, to identify the directors and the significant beneficial interest behind these companies.
Under Section 164 (2) of the Companies Act, 2013, a director in a company that has not filed financial statements or annual returns for three years in a row will not be eligible for re-appointment as a director in that or any other company for five years.#casansaar *Source - Economic Times)
Category : Companies Act | Comments : 0 | Hits : 1350
In a bid to prevent Chinese companies from circumventing Indian laws to do business in the country, the government has come up with a notification that requires land border-sharing nations' citizens who are appointed as directors on boards of companies to obtain a security clearance. According to a notification issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs on June 1, if a person from countries that share a land border is seeking an appointment in an Indian company, "nece...
Lok Sabha on Saturday passed a bill to further amend the Companies Act and decriminalise various compoundable offences as well as promote ease of doing business in the country. The Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2020 seeks to decriminalise various penal provisions, permit direct overseas listing of Indian corporates and introduce a new chapter related to producer organisations in the legislation. Reduction in penalties for certain offences as well as in timeline for rights issues, relaxation ...
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has information of the companies which have violated the provisions of Company Law. This was stated by Shri Anurag Singh Thakur, Union Minister of State for Finance & Corporate Affairs, in response to a written question in the Lok Sabha today. MCA either directly or through Regional Directors (RDs)/ Registrar of Companies (ROCs) receive complaints against companies from public (Individual/entities), from other Ministries etc., which are ex...
Government of India Ministry of Corporate Affairs (PI Section) Invitation for Public Comments on Draft Valuers Bill, 2020 Ministry of Corporate Affairs had constituted a Committee of Experts (CoE) under the Chairpersonship of Shri M. S. Sahoo, Chairperson, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) on 30th August 2019 to examine the need for an institutional fra...
The Supreme Court has issued non-bailable warrants against managing directors of 32 companies for not complying with its order. The managing directors now face imminent arrest and will have to be produced in the top court by the Mumbai Police if they fail to get preventive orders. The list of defaulting companies includes Akshar Mercantile, Beta Trading, Vinay Mercantile, Anoop Multitrade, Anshul Mercantile, Everfame Trading, Highzone Trading, Inorbit Trading Co., Laksh Mercantile, M...
Comments