CLB refers Unitech, Uninor dispute to arbitration
In a set back to Norwegian firm Telenor, the Company Law Board on Thursday allowed its estranged partner Unitech’s plea for settling dispute over control and transfer of assets of their joint venture Uninor through arbitration at Singapore.
Observing that Telenor had gone “berserk” in filing its petition seeking ouster of its partner Unitech after Supreme Court cancelled telecom licences of their JV, CLB Chairman Mr D R Deshmukh held that an arbitrator alone can decide if ‘Share Subscription Agreement’ and ‘Share Holders Agreement’ had been vitiated or not due to fraud.
The Supreme Court had in February held that the process of allocating 122 2G licenses including those to Uninor was ’arbitrary and unconstitutional’ and cancelled all of them.
Telenor, which bought stake in Uninor that was allocated 16 of those licences, sued Unitech for breach of warranties.
The order drew sharp reactions with Telenor saying it will challenge the CLB judgement in higher courts while realty firm Unitech said the order uphold the right of minority shareholder.
Telenor owns 67.25 per cent in Uninor which has over four crore subscribers. Realty firm Unitech holds the remaining 32.75 per cent in the JV.
“Telenor by claiming relief identical to relief claimed ... in its counter claim before the Arbitral Tribunal has left no room for any doubt that adjudication of the dispute arising ... must be left to the forum for resolution of dispute agreed by the parties i.e foreign arbitration,” CLB said in its 38-page long order.
“Parties (Telenor and Unitech) are referred to arbitration in accordance with the arbitration rules of Singapore International Arbitration Centre as contemplated under article 13 of the Share Subscription Agreement entered into between the parties,” it added. (PTI)
Category : Corporate Law | Comments : 0 | Hits : 339
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments