MCA likely to tighten fund raising norms by unlisted companies
Taking a leaf out of the Sahara case, the Corporate Affairs Ministry is contemplating to tighten fund raising norms from the public by unlisted companies.
The Ministry, according to an official, is of the view that an unlisted company should not be allowed to raise funds either through private placement of shares or deposits from more than 49 persons in a year.
The government is proposing to impose these restrictions by introducing new rules in the Companies Act, 1956, he said, adding, the changes would also help in clarifying the existing provisions in the Company Law.
According to Section 67 (3) of the Companies Act, if a company decides to allot shares to 50 people or more, it would become obligatory for it to apply for listing.
“The timeframe is not mentioned. It is not clear whether to interpret it as 50 people or more at a time, or 50 people or more in a year. So, that leads to a lot of misinterpretation and sometimes also misuse by companies.
“After the Sahara case, we want to tighten the norms to ensure there is no loophole,” the official said.
The Supreme Court in August had directed two Sahara firms to refund about Rs 24,000 crore to the investors within three months with an annual interest of 15 per cent, after finding violations of regulatory norms in raising funds from the public.
The money was raised through issue of an instrument called ‘Optionally Fully Convertible Debentures’ (OFCDs).
Following the court order, the Sahara group had assured its depositors and investors that their money was safe and there would be no delay in payment commitment to them.
If the two companies failed to refund the amount, Sebi could attach their properties as well as freeze bank accounts. Sebi has also been asked to investigate the issue. (PTI)
Category : Corporate Law | Comments : 0 | Hits : 415
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments