News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
Rajya Sabha return Finance Bill, 2017 with amendments
The Rajya Sabha on Wednesday returned the Finance Bill, 2017 to the Lok Sabha with five amendments.
The move came after the House discussed the Bill for over five hours on Tuesday and Wednesday. The Bill that was passed earlier by the Lok Sabha was moved in the Upper House on Monday.
Senior Congress leader Digvijay Singh moved amendments to three Clauses of the Bill---- Sections 132, 132(A) and 133 of the Income Tax Act that seek to amend IT Act, 1961.
The House adopted Singh’s amendments after division of votes went in favour of the Opposition.
Likewise, two amendments to the Bill moved by CPI-M leader Sitaram Yechury relating to amendments in the Companies Act for political funding were also adopted by the House after division of votes.
Following the adoption of the amendments, the House returned the Bill to the Lok Sabha that will consider the amendments. However, the amendments to a finance Bill are not binding on the Lok Sabha.
During the debate on the Bill, the Opposition charged the Government with bringing in matters unrelated to finance through the Finance Bill. The Opposition also charged that some of the proposed amendments moved by the Government in the original Bill relating to the amendments in the IT Act were “draconian” and will lead to the return of the Inspector raj.
Finance Minister Arun Jaitley in his reply sought to allay the apprehension of the Opposition and defended the Bill saying there is a lot of wild information going around the authority of the assessment officers over search and seizure.
Jaitley said a satisfaction note under Section 132 of the IT Act for conducting search and seizure will be submitted before the court and the amendments are aimed at protecting the identity of the source.
Meanwhile, the Trinamool Congress staged a walkout before the adoption of the amendments to Bill that was subsequently returned to the Lower House.#casansaar (PTI)
The move came after the House discussed the Bill for over five hours on Tuesday and Wednesday. The Bill that was passed earlier by the Lok Sabha was moved in the Upper House on Monday.
Senior Congress leader Digvijay Singh moved amendments to three Clauses of the Bill---- Sections 132, 132(A) and 133 of the Income Tax Act that seek to amend IT Act, 1961.
The House adopted Singh’s amendments after division of votes went in favour of the Opposition.
Likewise, two amendments to the Bill moved by CPI-M leader Sitaram Yechury relating to amendments in the Companies Act for political funding were also adopted by the House after division of votes.
Following the adoption of the amendments, the House returned the Bill to the Lok Sabha that will consider the amendments. However, the amendments to a finance Bill are not binding on the Lok Sabha.
During the debate on the Bill, the Opposition charged the Government with bringing in matters unrelated to finance through the Finance Bill. The Opposition also charged that some of the proposed amendments moved by the Government in the original Bill relating to the amendments in the IT Act were “draconian” and will lead to the return of the Inspector raj.
Finance Minister Arun Jaitley in his reply sought to allay the apprehension of the Opposition and defended the Bill saying there is a lot of wild information going around the authority of the assessment officers over search and seizure.
Jaitley said a satisfaction note under Section 132 of the IT Act for conducting search and seizure will be submitted before the court and the amendments are aimed at protecting the identity of the source.
Meanwhile, the Trinamool Congress staged a walkout before the adoption of the amendments to Bill that was subsequently returned to the Lower House.#casansaar (PTI)
Category : Finance Bill | Comments : 0 | Hits : 524
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments