Centre may appoint independent regulators for professional services
PrintListen to this Article
The government is planning to appoint independent regulators for services such as medicine, law, chartered accountancy, cost accountancy and company secretaryship.
According to sources in the commerce ministry, the existing structure of a regulator-cum-professional body for these services has resulted in several alleged instances of conflict of interest.
This hurt the credibility and reputation of these bodies and hampered India’s attempts to secure Mutual Recognition Agreements (MRA) with other countries to enable easier temporary movement of skilled workers and professionals across borders, the sources said.
The independent regulators will maintain distance from the professional bodies similar to the situation in developed countries, they said.
MRAs are pacts where two or more nations recognise each other’s compliance assessments to ensure that services, products and processes meet relevant technical norms.
The bodies being referred to by the commerce ministry include Medical Council of India (MCI), Bar Council of India (BCI), Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), Institute of Cost Accountants of India and Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI). All these are statutory bodies under an Act of Parliament.
According to the ministry, once independent regulators are appointed for these services, the chances of inking more MRAs automatically brighten up.
The ministry was initially considering preparing a comprehensive plan for appointing independent regulators for all these service segments and then coming out with a Cabinet note for inputs from other ministries. However, the “wholesale approach” has been junked.
The current plan is to initiate discussions with each of the ministries concerned (health, law and corporate affairs in this case). Then,separate Cabinet notes can be put up by the ministries on the need for independent regulators for these services, the sources said.
The move comes in the backdrop of the Supreme Court recently citing a Parliamentary panel report to state that the MCI “was repeatedly found short of fulfilling its mandated responsibilities” and that the “quality of medical education was at its lowest ebb…”.
The apex court, noting the instances of corruption in MCI, had set up an Oversight Committee to supervise the council’s functions and scrutinise its policy decisions.#casansaar (The Hindu)
Category : Finance | Comments : 2 | Hits : 1653
The Union Cabinet chaired by the Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi has approved the Terms of Reference for the Sixteenth Finance Commission. The Terms of Reference for the Sixteenth Finance Commission will be notified in due course of time. The 16th Finance Commission’s recommendations, upon the acceptance by the government, would cover the period of five (5) years commencing April 1, 2026. Article 280(1) of the Constitutions lays down that the modalities for setting up of a Fin...
Finance Act, 2023 received the assent of the President on the 31st March, 2023. Finance Bill, 2023 receives President's assent on Mar 31, 2023 and now its Finance Act, 2023. The Finance Act, 2023 has been enacted vide Gazette Notification dated today, March-31-2023. After obtaining the assent of the President of India, the Finance Bill, 2023 has been enacted as Finance Act, 2023.
The Finance Ministry has asked public sector banks to explore fintech partnerships and co-lending opportunities to expand their business. In the recently concluded performance review of PSBs by the Finance Ministry, sources said, lenders were asked to focus on technology and data analytics to push their lending. The ministry also urged the heads of the public sector lenders to strengthen IT security systems and cybersecurity to check fraud. &...
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Thursday said it has provisionally attached various immovable and movable properties worth Rs 2.14 crore of entry operators working for Shakti Bhog Foods Limited and their Chartered Accountants, in connection with a money laundering case pertaining to the bank loan fraud of Rs 3,269.42 crore. A senior ED official said that properties belonging to Devkinandan Garg, Ashok Kumar Goel, Mahesh Kumar, Devender Kumar and other entry operators a...
In a significant verdict, the Supreme Court Thursday ruled that the recommendations of Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council are not binding on the Union and the states and only have a persuasive value. The Supreme Court said that Parliament and state legislatures possess simultaneous power to legislate on GST and the recommendations of the council are the product of a collaborative dialogue involving the Union and states. It said that the GST Council...
Comments
Shantanu Goyal
05-May-2016 , 10:59:22 amBefore making independent regulator, Govt should make independent professional separate from appointing body. Regulatory bodies are burden over professionals without their independence. In every statutory appointment the appointing authority should be it's regulator not the concern entity like banks, PSU, companies and even partnership /individuals in certain cases.
RAVITOSH KUMAR
07-May-2016 , 12:05:54 amIts a very good idea, coming on one platform. MCI is in news for now but its the same in case of other regulators as well. Nominee members do not participate actively in functioning of their councils