News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
GST Council may correct rate anomaly on March 14
Mobile phones, textiles and a few other goods may become costlier if the GST Council chooses to correct certain duty structures on them due to which finished products attract lower duty than the raw material.
This imbalance in taxes, which is called inverted duty structure, has been resulting into a loss of close to Rs 25,000 crore per annum to the government as it has to refund the tax already paid.
Under the GST regime, a registered taxpayer can claim a refund on account of the rate of tax on inputs being higher than that on output supplies.
But when the raw material used attracts higher duty and the finished goods have a low duty, the finished goods producer gets a refund of the tax paid in the inputs he used.
This refund is often delayed as it is to be verified. Such a situation often led to a confrontation between the taxpayers and tax authorities, an official said.
The bulk of the refund demand due to inverted duty structure comes from the lower tax slabs of 5% or 12%.
The duty adjustment could be done by hiking the tax rate on finished products as also lowering the rate of the input tax credit.
At present mobile phones attract a 12% duty under the GST but its components attract 18%. Similarly, finished textiles have a 5% duty but the raw materials are taxed at 12%.
The industry associations have been raising the issue of this rate anomaly for some time. More than a dozen goods including mobile phones, footwear, fabrics, man-made yarn, ready-made garments fertilisers, tractors and pharma equipment attract lower duty on finished products but higher on the raw material.
The government was all set to take the decision in the GST Council meeting on March 14 but the only hitch is the prevalence of coronavirus issues that have already jacked up the cost of raw material and the finished products as well, the official said. #casansaar (Source - deccanherald Website)
This imbalance in taxes, which is called inverted duty structure, has been resulting into a loss of close to Rs 25,000 crore per annum to the government as it has to refund the tax already paid.
Under the GST regime, a registered taxpayer can claim a refund on account of the rate of tax on inputs being higher than that on output supplies.
But when the raw material used attracts higher duty and the finished goods have a low duty, the finished goods producer gets a refund of the tax paid in the inputs he used.
This refund is often delayed as it is to be verified. Such a situation often led to a confrontation between the taxpayers and tax authorities, an official said.
The bulk of the refund demand due to inverted duty structure comes from the lower tax slabs of 5% or 12%.
The duty adjustment could be done by hiking the tax rate on finished products as also lowering the rate of the input tax credit.
At present mobile phones attract a 12% duty under the GST but its components attract 18%. Similarly, finished textiles have a 5% duty but the raw materials are taxed at 12%.
The industry associations have been raising the issue of this rate anomaly for some time. More than a dozen goods including mobile phones, footwear, fabrics, man-made yarn, ready-made garments fertilisers, tractors and pharma equipment attract lower duty on finished products but higher on the raw material.
The government was all set to take the decision in the GST Council meeting on March 14 but the only hitch is the prevalence of coronavirus issues that have already jacked up the cost of raw material and the finished products as well, the official said. #casansaar (Source - deccanherald Website)
Category : GST | Comments : 0 | Hits : 290
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments