News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
GST only on monthly maintenance over Rs 7,500 - Madras HC
In a relief to resident welfare association (RWA) members across middle and high-end housing societies, the Madras High Court has ruled that the goods and services tax (GST) is applicable to monthly maintenance amount exceeding ₹7,500 only and not on the full amount.
The decision overturns a 2019 circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, which said exemption shall be granted only if the charges are limited to ₹7,500 per month and that full amount will be taxed beyond that.
The high court also quashed an Authority of Advance Rulings (AAR) order of 2019, which said that an exemption was permissible only if the contribution was up to ₹7,500. In case the contribution was more than ₹7,500, then exemption would not be valid and the full amount would have to be taxed, it said.
“The discussion as above leaves me no doubt that the conclusion of the AAR as well as the circular to the effect that any contribution above ₹7,500 would disentitle the RWA to exemption, is contrary to the express language of the entry in question and both stand quashed,” Justice Anita Sumanth said in the July 1 order, a copy of which has been seen by ET. “To clarify, it is only contributions to RWA in excess of ₹7,500 that would be taxable under GST Act.”
Experts said the ruling will benefit members of large RWAs across the country.
“In case of big RWAs, especially in tier-1 cities, every household could save up to ₹1,350 per month if the executive board of RWA takes a tax position based on this Madras High Court ruling,” said Rajat Mohan, senior partner at AMRG Associates.
However, he cautioned that the tax position is likely to have two risks – the department may challenge the order in a higher legal forum and tax officers in other states may deny the interpretation of the Madras High Court.
The decision overturns a 2019 circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, which said exemption shall be granted only if the charges are limited to ₹7,500 per month and that full amount will be taxed beyond that.
The high court also quashed an Authority of Advance Rulings (AAR) order of 2019, which said that an exemption was permissible only if the contribution was up to ₹7,500. In case the contribution was more than ₹7,500, then exemption would not be valid and the full amount would have to be taxed, it said.
“The discussion as above leaves me no doubt that the conclusion of the AAR as well as the circular to the effect that any contribution above ₹7,500 would disentitle the RWA to exemption, is contrary to the express language of the entry in question and both stand quashed,” Justice Anita Sumanth said in the July 1 order, a copy of which has been seen by ET. “To clarify, it is only contributions to RWA in excess of ₹7,500 that would be taxable under GST Act.”
Experts said the ruling will benefit members of large RWAs across the country.
“In case of big RWAs, especially in tier-1 cities, every household could save up to ₹1,350 per month if the executive board of RWA takes a tax position based on this Madras High Court ruling,” said Rajat Mohan, senior partner at AMRG Associates.
However, he cautioned that the tax position is likely to have two risks – the department may challenge the order in a higher legal forum and tax officers in other states may deny the interpretation of the Madras High Court.
Category : GST | Comments : 0 | Hits : 1644
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments