Govt moves SC against Bharti Airtel in Rs 923 Cr GST refund case
PrintListen to this Article
The case pertains to under-reporting of input tax credit in the GST summary return form, GSTR-3B, between July and September 2017 because of the absence of purchase-related return form, GSTR-2A, at that time. In May, the Delhi HC had allowed the telecom major to seek a refund by rectifying GST returns filed between July and September 2017.
The government has held that the Sunil Mittal-led company under-reported input tax credit, while the company argued that it paid excess tax on inputs, as the GSTR-2A form was not operational at the time. The form allows for validation before uploading.
The HC held that “indisputably, if the statutorily prescribed returns, GSTR-2 and GSTR-3 had been operationalised by the government, the petitioner would have known the correct input tax credit amount available to it in the relevant period, and could have discharged its liability through the tax credit”. It further said that as a consequence, the deficiency in reporting the eligible input tax credit had resulted in excess payment.
The central GST Act had provided for forms GSTR-1 (sales return), GSTR-2 (purchase return), and GSTR-3, which match sales and purchase details. With Forms 1 and 2 not operationalised, the government introduced Form-2A in October 2018 to avail of input tax credit and GSTR-3B to file summary returns.
In the absence of the GSTR-2A form at the time, Bharti Airtel contended that input tax credit details were submitted based on estimates and it noticed the under-reporting in October 2018. That is when it sought to revise its returns.
The telco tried to correct the anomaly based on the government’s September 2017 circular, which allowed for reconciliation of any mismatch. However, in December 2017, the government issued a fresh circular barring entities from making rectifications.
Airtel had contended that the Centre instead introduced GSTR-3B form, which required data to be filled in manually and does not permit data validation before it is uploaded. “The inability of the respondents to run their IT system according to the structure provided under the CGST Act cannot prejudice the rights of a registered person,” Airtel had argued. #casansaar (Source - Business Standard)
Category : GST | Comments : 0 | Hits : 426
TEST
Dear Taxpayers, 1. GSTN is pleased to inform that an enhanced version of the GST portal would be launched on 3rd May 2024. The effort is to improve user experience and ensure that the information you need is accessible and easy to navigate. 2. Key Enhancements Include (PDF with screenshots attached): i. News and Updates Section: We have introduced a dedicated tab for all news and updates. This section now includes a bet...
The Supreme Court on Friday issued notices to the central government, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), the Goods and Services (GST) Council and the National Anti-Profiteering Authority (its functions have been taken over by the Competition Commission of India) on a petition challenging a Delhi High Court verdict, upholding the constitutional validity of anti-profiteering provisions filed by a real estate company. The petition, filed by Swati Realty, says the high court ...
The delectable Malabar Parota will taste even better with the Kerala High Court ruling that the popular flatbread will attract GST at 5 per cent and not 18 per cent. With this the court has turned down order by the State’s Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) and Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR). Disposing a petition by Kochi-based Modern Food Enterprises, a single judge bench of Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh said if key inputs (cereals, flour, starch, etc) and preparations are s...
A businessman from Delhi was taken into custody by the Noida police for his alleged involvement in a massive Rs 15,000 crore GST fraud that was exposed last year, TOI reported. Tushar Gupta, aged 39 and residing in Tilak Nagar, was arrested as the 33rd suspect in this case. The police revealed that Gupta had exploited input tax credit (ITC) using 35 fake companies, resulting in a loss of Rs 24 crore to the exchequer over the past two years. He was reportedly part of a syndicate that utiliz...
Comments