News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
HC allows adjustment of wrong payment in GST
In what is seen as a major relief for GST assessees, especially dealers, the Kerala High Court has ruled that any GST mistakenly paid under one head can be adjusted under the correct head.
While noting that it sees no difficulty for the tax authorities to allow the petitioner’s request and get the amount transferred from the head ‘S-GST’ to ‘I-GST’, the court said it is inequitable for the authorities to let the petitioner suffer.
The court made these observations while disposing of a matter involving Saji S of Adithya and Ambadi Traders, Ranjith R of Ranjith Roadlines, and the State GST authorities.
Since the ruling is by a High Court, it can set a precedent for similar matters.
The said dealer bought goods from Chennai and transported them to Kerala. However, on way, the goods were seized, and a demand was made for tax and penalty. The payment was made under the head ‘State Goods and Services Tax’ (S-GST) and this became a matter of litigation.
The petitioner insisted that the payment was made on the instructions of the Assistant State Tax Officer (ASTO). But, by law, the remittance must have been made under the head ‘Integrated Goods and Services Tax’ (I-GST).
The petitioner submitted that even if the remittance was a mistake on the consignor’s part, the law empowers the authorities to transfer the deposit from one head to another, that is, from S-GST to I-GST.
But the tax authorities wanted the petitioner to pay the dues under I-GST and then claim refund under S-GST.
The court observed that there was no dispute on paying the tax and the penalty. Only, they had been remitted under the head S-GST, instead of I-GST. The court referred to Section 77 of the GST Tax and Rule 4(1).
Section 77 deals with tax refund of the tax mistakenly paid under one head. Rule 4(1) provides for an adjustment.
Preferring the adjustment route, the court asked the tax authorities to release the goods and the vehicle and ensure that the tax and penalty paid under S-GST get transferred to the I-GST.
Experts feel the ruling brings relief to tax-payers. Since the GST is a new law, many tax-payers have been struggling on this count of wrong payment of tax. The adjustment of tax paid under one head to another will save them the bother of paying again under the correct head and then claiming a refund. #casansaar (Source - The Hindu Business)
While noting that it sees no difficulty for the tax authorities to allow the petitioner’s request and get the amount transferred from the head ‘S-GST’ to ‘I-GST’, the court said it is inequitable for the authorities to let the petitioner suffer.
The court made these observations while disposing of a matter involving Saji S of Adithya and Ambadi Traders, Ranjith R of Ranjith Roadlines, and the State GST authorities.
Since the ruling is by a High Court, it can set a precedent for similar matters.
The said dealer bought goods from Chennai and transported them to Kerala. However, on way, the goods were seized, and a demand was made for tax and penalty. The payment was made under the head ‘State Goods and Services Tax’ (S-GST) and this became a matter of litigation.
The petitioner insisted that the payment was made on the instructions of the Assistant State Tax Officer (ASTO). But, by law, the remittance must have been made under the head ‘Integrated Goods and Services Tax’ (I-GST).
The petitioner submitted that even if the remittance was a mistake on the consignor’s part, the law empowers the authorities to transfer the deposit from one head to another, that is, from S-GST to I-GST.
But the tax authorities wanted the petitioner to pay the dues under I-GST and then claim refund under S-GST.
The court observed that there was no dispute on paying the tax and the penalty. Only, they had been remitted under the head S-GST, instead of I-GST. The court referred to Section 77 of the GST Tax and Rule 4(1).
Section 77 deals with tax refund of the tax mistakenly paid under one head. Rule 4(1) provides for an adjustment.
Preferring the adjustment route, the court asked the tax authorities to release the goods and the vehicle and ensure that the tax and penalty paid under S-GST get transferred to the I-GST.
Experts feel the ruling brings relief to tax-payers. Since the GST is a new law, many tax-payers have been struggling on this count of wrong payment of tax. The adjustment of tax paid under one head to another will save them the bother of paying again under the correct head and then claiming a refund. #casansaar (Source - The Hindu Business)
Category : GST | Comments : 0 | Hits : 899
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments