News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
Parliament empowered to enact special laws on GST - High Court
Four years after the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act was enacted, the Punjab and Haryana High Court today expressed prime facie view that Parliament was empowered under the Constitution to come up with special laws on the issue.
The assertion came as the Bench of Justice Rajan Gupta and Justice Karamjit Singh dismissed an interim protection plea filed by Narinder Chugh against the Union of India and other respondents in an alleged GST evasion case. Among other things, the Bench was told that total amount of GST evasion in the case was of Rs 7,83,15,309.
The matter was placed before the Bench after the petitioner challenged the vires of Sections 69 and 132 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017. He also prayed for interim protection during the pendency of the writ petition as non-bailable warrants had been issued by the competent authority. His apprehension was that he may be taken into custody, as he appeared before the authority concerned.
The Bench asserted it was of the prima facie view that the special enactment has been enacted for the recovery of taxes, under enabling provisions contained in Section 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). The court was also of prima facie view that Parliament was empowered under Article 246A of the Constitution to enact special laws with regard to Goods and Services Tax (GST).
“The legislation enacted is for levy and collection of taxes on the supply of goods and services having special provisions for recovery of revenue. It being a fiscal matter, a distinct procedure appears to have been evolved by Parliament by virtue of a special enactment, which is permissible under Section 4 of the CrPC,” the Bench added.
The matter was placed before the Bench after the petitioner challenged the vires of Sections 69 and 132 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. He also prayed for interim protection during the pendency of the writ petition as non-bailable warrants had been issued by the competent authority. His apprehension was that he may be taken in custody, as he appeared before the authority concerned.
Appearing before the Bench, a senior counsel on the petitioner’s behalf also raised a number of other legal issues, particularly the powers of the legislature to enact laws under Article 246A. He also referred to the provisions of the CrPC to contend that an offence under the CGST would be investigated, inquired into, tried and otherwise dealt with according to provisions of the code, subject to any provision contrary in the CGST Act. “Since we are dealing only with the prayer for interim relief at present, we do not intend to express any final opinion on the issue,” the Bench concluded.
The assertion came as the Bench of Justice Rajan Gupta and Justice Karamjit Singh dismissed an interim protection plea filed by Narinder Chugh against the Union of India and other respondents in an alleged GST evasion case. Among other things, the Bench was told that total amount of GST evasion in the case was of Rs 7,83,15,309.
The matter was placed before the Bench after the petitioner challenged the vires of Sections 69 and 132 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017. He also prayed for interim protection during the pendency of the writ petition as non-bailable warrants had been issued by the competent authority. His apprehension was that he may be taken into custody, as he appeared before the authority concerned.
The Bench asserted it was of the prima facie view that the special enactment has been enacted for the recovery of taxes, under enabling provisions contained in Section 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). The court was also of prima facie view that Parliament was empowered under Article 246A of the Constitution to enact special laws with regard to Goods and Services Tax (GST).
“The legislation enacted is for levy and collection of taxes on the supply of goods and services having special provisions for recovery of revenue. It being a fiscal matter, a distinct procedure appears to have been evolved by Parliament by virtue of a special enactment, which is permissible under Section 4 of the CrPC,” the Bench added.
The matter was placed before the Bench after the petitioner challenged the vires of Sections 69 and 132 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. He also prayed for interim protection during the pendency of the writ petition as non-bailable warrants had been issued by the competent authority. His apprehension was that he may be taken in custody, as he appeared before the authority concerned.
Appearing before the Bench, a senior counsel on the petitioner’s behalf also raised a number of other legal issues, particularly the powers of the legislature to enact laws under Article 246A. He also referred to the provisions of the CrPC to contend that an offence under the CGST would be investigated, inquired into, tried and otherwise dealt with according to provisions of the code, subject to any provision contrary in the CGST Act. “Since we are dealing only with the prayer for interim relief at present, we do not intend to express any final opinion on the issue,” the Bench concluded.
Category : GST | Comments : 0 | Hits : 310
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments