Lok Sabha passes Citizenship Amendment Bill
Listen to this Article
The bill, among other things, seeks to grant citizenship to Hindus, Jains, Parsis, Buddhists and Christians who migrated to India till the end of 2014 from countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan, due to reasons like persecutions. However, the bill exempts certain tribal areas included in the Sixth Schedule and those falling under the Inner Line Permit Regime in the North Eastern States. It amends the Citizenship Act 1955, the Passport Act 1920 and the Foreigners Act 1946 for implementation of its provisions.
Replying to the discussion, Home Minister Amit Shah said, the bill does not violate any provisions of the Constitution including Article 14 that places all people equally before law. He said, Article 14 does not rule out any amendment to the Citizens Act. Mr Shah reiterated that religious persecutions in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan, who have expressly declared Islam as their State Religion, necessitated the bill. He pointed out to the declining minority population in the three neighbouring countries. He said, the bill is not discriminatory against Muslims. He added, Manipur will be brought under the Inner Line Permit Regime for the Bill.
When the Opposition interrupted the Home Minister repeatedly asking why the bill has been brought in now, he said, it was necessitated due to the division of India on the basis of religion. He reiterated that no minority community in India is targeted in the bill. Referring to Sri Lankan Tamils, he said, lakhs of them were granted Indian citizenship as per the Lal Bahadur Shastri-Sirimao Bandaranaike accord. He noted that all North Eastern states have supported the bill and their concerns have been addressed. He re-emphasized that the NRC will be brought about at all costs.
Earlier, initiating the discussion, Mr Manish Tewari of Congress called the bill a monumental blunder, violating Article 14 of the Constitution.
Mr Rajendra Agarwal of BJP accused the Congress of opposing the bill by using selective interpretation of secularism with vote bank politics in mind.
Mr Rajiv Ranjan Singh of the JD(U) supported the bill saying, the minorities from the neighbouring countries had to migrate to India illegally only due to persecution, though they also contributed to the freedom struggle before the partition. Mr Dayanidhi Maran of the DMK asked why Sri Lankan Tamils are excluded from the purview of the bill. Ms Supriya Sule of the NCP said Muslims are feeling insecure.
Mr Venkatesan of the CPIM said the bill is against the basic framework of the Constitution while Mr Subbarayan of the CPI said the bill discriminates on the basis of religion.
Mr Abhishek Banerjee of AITC said, religious or cultural identities cannot be a factor in deciding on citizenship and Mr N K Premachandran of the RSP also echoed the same view.
Mr Midhun Reddy of the YSR Congress Party supported the bill with the demand that the states should also be taken into confidence in the implementation of the law.
Mr Afzal Ansari of the BSP said, those Muslims migrated from India to Pakistan during the partition are also facing discrimination there.
Ms Agatha Sangma of the National Peoples Party supported the bill saying it has been brought in after extensive consultations with the North Easters states. A total of 48 members spoke on the bill.
The Bill earlier faced stiff resistance from the Opposition also when Home Minister Amit Shah sought to move the bill in the House. After a brief discussion on the grounds of opposition to moving it and a reply by the Home Minister, it was introduced after division with 293 members voting in favour of it and 82 opposing.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi has expressed delight over the passage of the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha. In a tweet last night, he said, the Lok Sabha has passed the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2019 after a rich and extensive debate.
The Prime Minister said, the proposed law is in line with India's centuries old ethos of assimilation and belief in humanitarian values. He thanked the MPs and different parties that supported the bill. Mr Modi said, he would like to specially applaud Home Minister Amit Shah for lucidly explaining all aspects of the measure. #casansaar (Source - NewsOnAir)
Category : General | Comments : 0 | Hits : 283
Retirement fund body EPFO has said it will no longer use Aadhaar as a valid document for proof of date of birth. In an official circular on January 16, the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) said the decision to remove Aadhaar was taken following a directive from the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI). As per the circular, Aadhaar is also being removed from the list of documents for correction in date of birth.
A five-day-long Special Parliament Session will be held from Monday. A Parliamentary Bulletin said, that on the first day a discussion on the Parliamentary Journey of 75 years starting from Samvidhan Sabha - Achievements, Experiences, Memories, and Learnings will be held in Lok Sabha. The Government has listed Bill on the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner, and other election commissioners in the upcoming Parliament Session. Apart from this The Advocates (Amendment) Bill, Th...
Artificial intelligence can substitute neither the human intelligence nor the humane element in the adjudicatory process, the Delhi high court has held and said ChatGPT can't be the basis of adjudication of legal or factual issues in a court of law. Justice Prathiba M Singh stated that the accuracy and reliability of AI generated data is still in the grey area and at best, such a tool can be utilised for a preliminary understanding or for preliminary research. The court's observati...
Domain + Website + Hosting + 2 email ids @ Just Rs.3100/- with 30 days Money Back Guarantee. CASANSAAR offers a Golden opportunity for Professionals, where they could create their own stunning website with multiple designs and templates to choose. It will be completely your own space, which is going to be a Dynamic Website and could be edited as per your wish. Now Get 2 Email ID's with Your Own Websi...
The Delhi High Court Monday sought the Centre’s stand in a plea against a notification where chartered accountants, company secretaries and cost accountants have been included among “reporting entities” under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) A division bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Sanjeev Narula granted time to Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, who appeared for the Centre, to “seek instructions” and listed the ma...


Comments