SC pulls up Govt for not appointing members in Tribunals
The Supreme Court today pulled up the Centre for "sitting over" for months on the recommendation of the Chief Justice of India for appointments in various tribunals including CAT, ITAT and NGT saying that litigants should not suffer due to vacancies in quasi judicial bodies.
A bench of Justices T S Thakur, Rohinton F Nariman and P C Pant asked attorney general Mukul Rohatgi to why the government was not clearing the names which were recommended by CJI months ago. It also asked the government to consider extending the tenure of judges and other members of tribunals on ad-hoc basis till a new appointment is made.
"There is no sense of urgency at all on the part of the government," the bench said while pointing out that recommendation for appointment in income tax appellate tribunal (ITAT) was forwarded eight months back and government had not taken any decision till date.
"We cleared the names eight months back but the government is sitting over it. We don't know why," the bench said asking the AG to look into the issue. It also said that recommendations were also made months ago for appointments in central administrative tribunal and national green tribunal but no decision had been taken by the government so far.
It said that litigants suffer die to vacancies in tribunals resulting in huge pendency of cases.
"Why don't you consider that judges should continue to function on an ad-hoc basis even after retirement till fresh appointment is made? Why don't you follow the principle 'king continues to function till successor is appointed'? You seriously consider it," the bench said.
The court said that some retired judges, whose names were recommended, backed out due to delay in the appointment.
"Before anybody files a PIL on this issue and you feel embarrassed, you look into it and take a decision," it said.
The court was hearing a PIL challenging constitutional validity of National Company Law Tribunal and National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. (Times of India)
Category : General | Comments : 0 | Hits : 434
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments