News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
SC to hear petition against linking Aadhaar to bank accounts and mobile
service, a petition has been filed in the Supreme Court challenging the government's directive to link the two with Aadhaar numbers. According to petition, filed by activist Dr. Kalyani Menon Sen, the government's rule on linking Aadhaar violates the fundamental right to privacy and equates citizens, including the elderly, women and students, with money launderers.
"Non-compliance incurs the same liability as Section 5 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (for involvement in money laundering), that is rendering the concerned bank account in-operational. Present and potential bank account holders, who do not wish to part with their biometric information, are therefore treated on par with alleged offenders under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)," said Menon while submitting the petition.
The petition challenges Rule 2(b) of the Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Second Amendment Rules, 2017 for companies, partnership firms and trusts for opening of bank accounts, maintaining existing bank accounts, making financial transactions of and above ?50,000 and crediting foreign remittance into 'small accounts'
Provisions regarding both bank accounts and mobile phones have been blamed for creating an "impermissible artificial distinction" between those who have parted with their private, biometric information and those who have not.
It also blamed mobile phone circulars to be violative of Article 300A of the Constitution and Aadhaar Act 2016. While the former protects a person's right to not be deprived of property, the latter limits the purpose of the Aadhaar number to receipt of a public subsidy, benefit or) a service, the petition said.
"A bank account and mobile phone connection is the personal property of an individual. There exists numerous, less invasive and less disruptive methods of verifying the identity of account holders," said Menon. #casansaar (Source - Business Today)
"Non-compliance incurs the same liability as Section 5 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (for involvement in money laundering), that is rendering the concerned bank account in-operational. Present and potential bank account holders, who do not wish to part with their biometric information, are therefore treated on par with alleged offenders under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)," said Menon while submitting the petition.
The petition challenges Rule 2(b) of the Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Second Amendment Rules, 2017 for companies, partnership firms and trusts for opening of bank accounts, maintaining existing bank accounts, making financial transactions of and above ?50,000 and crediting foreign remittance into 'small accounts'
Provisions regarding both bank accounts and mobile phones have been blamed for creating an "impermissible artificial distinction" between those who have parted with their private, biometric information and those who have not.
It also blamed mobile phone circulars to be violative of Article 300A of the Constitution and Aadhaar Act 2016. While the former protects a person's right to not be deprived of property, the latter limits the purpose of the Aadhaar number to receipt of a public subsidy, benefit or) a service, the petition said.
"A bank account and mobile phone connection is the personal property of an individual. There exists numerous, less invasive and less disruptive methods of verifying the identity of account holders," said Menon. #casansaar (Source - Business Today)
Category : General | Comments : 0 | Hits : 490
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments