Clarification on Fees from a Single Client - ICAI
PrintListen to this Article
As the members are aware, the revised Code of Ethics will come into effect w.e.f 1st July, 2020.
Some members have expressed their concern on one of the provisions contained in Paragraph R410.4 of the Volume-I of revised Code of Ethics on measures for addressing self-interest threats resulting from dependence of Fees from a single client.
It may be clarified that there is NOT a bar in the revised Code of Ethics on acceptance of more than 15% fees from a single client. There is only requirement of disclosure , and taking safeguards prescribed therein, if the total gross annual professional fees from the audit client and its related entities represent more than 15% of the total fees received by the firm expressing the opinion on the financial statements of the client for two consecutive years.
Accordingly, the Audit may be continued while taking safeguards as mentioned in the said Paragraph.
It may further be clarified that this rule would not apply in Case of audit of Government Companies, public undertakings, nationalized banks, public financial institutions or where appointments are made by Government; OR where the total gross annual fees of the Firm does not exceed five lakhs of rupees.
It may also be relevant to note that the rule applies ONLY where such Fees is received from an AUDIT CLIENT. (Source - ICAI Website)
Category : ICAI | Comments : 0 | Hits : 5104
The CA Institute has proceeded and notified its revised exam dates (announced on March 19) for the intermediate course examination and final examination despite a pending Supreme Court hearing slated for April 29 on postponement plea filed by some CA Students. An ICAI notification—gazetted on April 25 —showed that the intermediate course exams will be held on May 3, 5 & 9 (Group I) and May 11, 15 and 17 (Group II). The final exams are scheduled for May 2, 4 and 8 (Group ...
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has found gross negligence by edtech firm Byju's auditors, ICAI president Ranjeet Kumar Agarwal said on Wednesday. "Our inspection has found gross negligence on accounting practices by individual auditors of Byju's and accordingly we have recommended to the Financial Reporting Review Board (FRRB) to take punitive actions on auditors concerned," Agarwal told news agency PTI. Agarwal said, "The FRRB wil...
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) raided premises linked to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s personal secretary Bibhav Kumar, and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) Rajya Sabha MP, Past President of ICAI Sh.ND Gupta in connection with a money laundering probe related to the Jal Board case. The central probe agency had last month arrested Jagdish Kumar Arora, the former chief engineer of the Delhi Jal Board. The probe agency claims that Arora awarded a contract worth Rs 38 crore to NKG Infrastru...
A bench of justice Bharav D Karia had observed that the activity of a CA includes that of accounting, auditing, refereeing, receivers, arbitrators and special commissioners as prescribed by the ICAI to be carried out on-premises and at places of managing partner may determine The Gujarat high court has ruled that a Chartered Accountancy (CA) firm should be classified as a professional establishment rather than a shop, commercial or retail entity and as a result, its employees are deemed ineli...
Notice Sent to Kumar Vishwas by Advocate (CA) Dr. Suneel Maggo for his Derogatory Remarks against Professionals (Chartered Accountants and Company Secretaries). We had discussed the matter with Advocate Suneel Maggo and the same has been uploaded on the youtube but on the pressure of Kumar Vishwas, Video has been removed 2 times. In his notice to Kumar Vishwas, He asked for Sorry to the Professional else Next Defemation Notice to Kumar Vishwas for his Derogatory Remarks against Chartered A...
Comments