News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
ICAI releases CA exam policy draft, Omits scope of Re-Evaluation
Months after forming a high level committee for looking into CA exam process and regulation, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has released the draft report based on the recommendations given by the committee. The ICAI had formed the committee and invited suggestions from stakeholders on various issues related to the CA exams, days after CA students staged protest in Delhi demanding re-evaluation of CA answer papers.
In the draft report, the ICAI has omitted the scope of re-evaluation citing regulation 39 (4) of CA Regulations 1988. CA students had demanded an amendment in the said regulation.
It may be noted that explanation to Regulation 39(4) of the CA Regulations, 1988, provides specifically that "re-examination of answers shall not be permitted under any circumstances", the CA exam regulator has said in the draft report.
ICAI has invited suggestions from stakeholders on the draft report till February 24.
The high level committee comprised Dr. P. C. Jain, Govt. Nominee in the Central Council, Convenor; Justice (CA.) Anil R. Dave, Former Judge, Supreme Court of India; CA. Ved Jain, Past President, ICAI; CA. Amarjit Chopra, Past President, ICAI and CA. (Dr.) Girish Ahuja, Educationist. Rakesh Sehgal, Acting Secretary ICAI, acted as Secretary to this Committee.
In its draft report, ICAI has discussed about the suggested answers. The suggested answers are the model answers, says ICAI, which are indicative only and not exhaustive. ICAI says students misconstrue the suggested answers to be complete or actual answers.
Suggested answers do not constitute the basis for evaluation of the students' answers in the examination, it says.
"The examiner will use his/her discretion (about quality of arguments, use of evidence, presentation, etc.) and award appropriate marks to the answers, if the approach followed is found valid and the answer is correct. Examiners may use their judgment in allotting marks to partly answered questions also," the draft report reads.
The committee also recommends capping the number of attempts in CA exams. While it recommends limiting number of attempts in CA Foundation exam to three times, it plans not to impose any restriction on CA final exam attempts.
"A student who secures less than 20% of the total marks of a group or both the groups of the Intermediate level exam, in which he had appeared, in two consecutive exams, may not be permitted to appear in the two succeeding exams," it recommends for CA intermediate level exam.
In September 2019 CA students claimed that their answer sheets were not evaluated properly, and protested outside its central Delhi office demanding re-evaluation.
The protest was backed by Rahul Gandhi. "Given the widespread reports of errors in the evaluation of answer sheets, this demand is justified and should be supported by all political parties," he had said then.
As on September 27, the ICAI had received around 53,000 applications for showing answer sheets from around three lakh CA aspirants who took the exams conducted by the institute.. #casansaar (Source - NDTC Website)
In the draft report, the ICAI has omitted the scope of re-evaluation citing regulation 39 (4) of CA Regulations 1988. CA students had demanded an amendment in the said regulation.
It may be noted that explanation to Regulation 39(4) of the CA Regulations, 1988, provides specifically that "re-examination of answers shall not be permitted under any circumstances", the CA exam regulator has said in the draft report.
ICAI has invited suggestions from stakeholders on the draft report till February 24.
The high level committee comprised Dr. P. C. Jain, Govt. Nominee in the Central Council, Convenor; Justice (CA.) Anil R. Dave, Former Judge, Supreme Court of India; CA. Ved Jain, Past President, ICAI; CA. Amarjit Chopra, Past President, ICAI and CA. (Dr.) Girish Ahuja, Educationist. Rakesh Sehgal, Acting Secretary ICAI, acted as Secretary to this Committee.
In its draft report, ICAI has discussed about the suggested answers. The suggested answers are the model answers, says ICAI, which are indicative only and not exhaustive. ICAI says students misconstrue the suggested answers to be complete or actual answers.
Suggested answers do not constitute the basis for evaluation of the students' answers in the examination, it says.
"The examiner will use his/her discretion (about quality of arguments, use of evidence, presentation, etc.) and award appropriate marks to the answers, if the approach followed is found valid and the answer is correct. Examiners may use their judgment in allotting marks to partly answered questions also," the draft report reads.
The committee also recommends capping the number of attempts in CA exams. While it recommends limiting number of attempts in CA Foundation exam to three times, it plans not to impose any restriction on CA final exam attempts.
"A student who secures less than 20% of the total marks of a group or both the groups of the Intermediate level exam, in which he had appeared, in two consecutive exams, may not be permitted to appear in the two succeeding exams," it recommends for CA intermediate level exam.
In September 2019 CA students claimed that their answer sheets were not evaluated properly, and protested outside its central Delhi office demanding re-evaluation.
The protest was backed by Rahul Gandhi. "Given the widespread reports of errors in the evaluation of answer sheets, this demand is justified and should be supported by all political parties," he had said then.
As on September 27, the ICAI had received around 53,000 applications for showing answer sheets from around three lakh CA aspirants who took the exams conducted by the institute.. #casansaar (Source - NDTC Website)
Category : ICAI | Comments : 0 | Hits : 895
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments