Lawyers wants Authorisation to Sign and furnish Tax Audit Certificates / Reports
Opening up a money-spinning career proposition for lawyers in the country, the Bar Council of India (BCI) has written to the Union ministry of finance and tax authorities such as Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) that lawyers must be authorised to sign and furnish tax audit certificates/reports, which has been hitherto the bastion of Chartered Accountants.
"The BCI has accepted a report submitted by a two-member committee comprising S Prabakaran and Rameshchandra G Shah, and has written to tax authorities informing them that a combined reading of the Income Tax Law and the Advocates Act made it clear that such audit reports/certificates could be signed only by advocates," Prabakaran, who is now co-chairman of the Bar Council of India, told TOI.
Noting that as of now CAs can sign and furnish tax audit reports in Form No. 3CD under Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act without actually conducting an audit, the report said that as audit meant mere verification it was not the domain of CAs alone.
"Chartered Accountants are trained in accounts only and not in interpretation of tax law and procedures. In order to practice income tax law and to fill tax audit reports form 3CD, one should specialise in interpretation of tax law and procedures, besides analysing intention of the legislature, Civil Procedure Code and impact of furnishing affidavit and sworn statements in the course of IT proceedings," the report said.
Demanding a toe-hold for lawyers in non-corporate matters, the report said that as of 2010-11 there were only 59,472 CAs involved in the collection of revenue under direct taxes. If lawyers are permitted, tax base will expand and collection of tax too would increase, owing to higher awareness and penetration.
The practice of enclosing the tax audit certificates by CAs was introduced in 1984 at the behest of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, the report said, adding that such certificates/reports were not in practice in any other country.
It said due to this, lawyers found it difficult to practice income tax law independently. The only legal provision which enabled CAs to practice before tax forums was Section 33 of the Advocates Act which permitted advocates and practitioners "under any other law" to appear before the forum concerned.
Relying on the 2012 judgment of the Supreme Court in the BCI Vs A K Balaji case, the report said the court had held that advocates alone were entitled to practice law in litiguous as well as non-litiguous matters. (Times of India)
Category : ICAI | Comments : 6 | Hits : 3081
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments
SAKTHI
01-Jan-2014 , 12:44:09 pmA Notable Argument. But let them learn CA and qualify and then they can do whatever they like. But without the knowledge of Accountancy,Taxation,Corporate Affairs etc how it is possible to report and certify upon Tax audit report or anything else....
ALEXANDAR GAZI
01-Jan-2014 , 08:19:26 pmWell, one can think freely and express freely without base. Have ever they gone through form 3cd. it requires expert accounting knowledge blending with income tax knowledge to fill up properly. Try to become a Chartered Accountant or think logically.
abdul rakheeb
02-Jan-2014 , 10:36:33 amIt required expertise knowledge in not only in Taxation and also in accountancy,finance and corporate affairs. mere knowledge in taxation doesn't serve any purpose.
MADHAVAN
03-Jan-2014 , 11:32:00 pmIf the Advocates or Bar Council of India /Govt permits the Chartered Accountants / ACS/ CMS to appear before High Courts and Supreme courts as Authorised person. (Without holding Law Degree) for the matters of Business Laws(Income Tax, Service Tax, Customs, Excise), then we are also OK for this.
MADHAVAN
04-Jan-2014 , 12:35:54 pmLawyers thinking that they are only the person having interpretation skills, please learned lawyers Beggars having better interpretation skills than you, why should not allow they , argue before the courts as authorized persons.
Ankit Gupta
14-Jan-2014 , 06:49:28 pmWe all know that how many cases are pending in our courts, whether it is at district court or high court or supreme court and the basic reason behind the pendency of any case is also known to all of us. So it would be better if they try to complete these cases to relieve many needy people who are suffering from the atrocities of our legal system. Moreover as per my knowledge of section 44AB of Inc