Extension of Tax Audit Report Date by CBDT or Punishment by CBDT?
Listen to this Article
The Income Tax Act provides Auditors a time frame of 180 days, from April 1 to Sept 30, to plan our schedule and utilization of resources to perform our duties as Tax Auditors accordingly. Then why and how the CBDT may deprive us from the time slot allowed under the Act, by making some amendments in Rules in mid of year all of a sudden and in arbitrary way.
We were not begging for deferment of TAR, but we were fighting towards our fundamental rights, viz. the fair time allowed to the auditors of 180 days to perform the tax audit under the law.
If the Income Tax dept. could not provide Schema or else, why they brought in hurry such foolish notification on 25 July, 2014 to make the whole Tax Audit process at a stand still all over the nation. Whether there is no value of our time for them or no one is concerned about its loss.
What the CBDT gave us in the name of Date Extension of furnishing TAR yesterday to 30 November, 2014 was very much probable. They were liable to compensate for the loss of time since 25 July 2014 to lakhs of Auditors and Assessees involved in Tax Audit for halting the Tax Audit process and not bringing the required Schema even so far. To hide their inefficiency and to make us silent, the CBDT brought the Extension of TAR furnishing date to 30th November. In fact, we have got nothing but only an extension, which would make us to loss our another 2 months' time for same audit work, which otherwise would be completed by 30 Sept..
Why we should unnecessarily to be engaged upto 30th November for the Tax Audit work, which we were capable and planned to handle by 30th Sept. itself? Why we should bear for the faults of CBDT..??
Any transit to new audit formats by CBDT should always be smooth, well planned, flawless, notified in advance and over night, so as to not hamper the work Even for a Single Day.
And the mid year significant changes in Audit Formats are not tolerable at all.
What was the urgency and relevance to bring it in mid of the year, where lot of work was under process and around uploading.
Why two set of TARs acceptable to CBDT for single A.Y. Is it justified?
Why we as auditors to re-visit or audit afresh the TARs completed by us, but only pending to upload? Why not the CBDT may notify TAR well before 31st Marchto let every CA plan their audit schedules accordingly?
Why all TARs uploaded untill their own e-filing website accepted it not to be treated as valid, but only those uploaded upto 24 July? Why not they put immediate check at site not to accept uploading of TAR with notification on 25 July itself? Why Auditors to revise already uploaded TARs, duly approved by assessee and ITR also uploaded? As the message on e-filing website came very late that it may not be liable to be accepted, In between, many TARs and ITRs were uploaded. Why again the Assessees, CAs and Advocates waste their precious time in revision of TAR and uploading of ITR again in such cases?
And what about TAR given in hard copy to clients for submission to banks, though may not be uploaded on website due to our laxity or otherwise. At least they should grant 7 days time to submit it in hard copy to respective A.Os. and accept the same as valid.
If CBDT is technically unable or has any problem to bring good Schema (TAR utility), they should make provision either for its submission in pdf format and not in xml or submission of hard copy of TAR with A.O. to make the things simple and straight.
But it is not so. Perhaps they will continue their experiments with us and might bring even more versions of TAR Schema than last year, making the whole audit process on halt again and again.
In the above context, considering the various practical problems associated in implementing the New TAR in mid of year and to further save the precious time of lakhs of CAs and Assessees wasted so far, we again demand that the whole audit process would not be hampered by CBDT even for a single day by bringing any unplanned notification or want of Utility or Schema.
And the Government should kindly allow Previous TAR Format and Schema to continue even for the period after 24 July, 2014 and let the proposed changes to be made to TAR formats effective only w.e.f. 1.4.2014 after developing and thorough testing of a foolproof Schema Utility and in consultation with ICAI to make it more appropriate and more effective tool for the Income Tax Department.
Category : Income Tax | Comments : 3 | Hits : 2875
As many as 5,44,205 appeals were pending resolution with the Income Tax (IT) Department at commissioner (appeals) level as of January 31 this year, and 63,246 at various Income Tax Appellate Tribunals (ITATs), High Courts, and the Supreme Court, FE has learnt. To be precise, the cases pending in ITATs were 20,266 High Courts, 37,436; and Supreme Court 5,544. The large pendency is even as the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has laid emphasis on disposing of income tax appeals in its 10...
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has facilitated taxpayers to file their Income Tax Returns (ITRs) for the Assessment Year 2024-25 (relevant to Financial Year 2023-24) from 1st April, 2024 onwards. The ITR functionalities i.e. ITR-1, ITR-2 and ITR-4, commonly used by taxpayers are available on the e-filing portal from 1st April, 2024 onwards for taxpayers to file their Returns. Companies will also be able to file their ITRs through ITR-6 from April 1 onwards. As ...
It has come to notice that misleading information related to new tax regime is being spread on some social media platforms. It is therefore clarified that the new regime under section 115BAC(1A) was introduced in the Finance Act 2023 which was as under as compared to the existing old regime (without exemptions): New Regime 115BAC (1A) introduced for FY 2023-24 Existing old Regime 0-3 lacs 0% 0-2.5 lacs 0% ...
The income tax department on Sunday said it has started sending emails and SMSs to assessees whose taxes paid during the current fiscal are not commensurate with financial transactions. To flag the mismatches in payment of taxes in financial year 2023-24 (assessment year 2024-25) and the financial transactions made by persons or entities, the Income Tax Department has started sending emails and messages through SMSs to assessees. The tax department on Sunday urged assesses, who have not pa...
Income of any fund or institution or trust or any university or other educational institution or any hospital or other medical institution referred to in specified sub-clauses of section 10 (23C) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’) or any trust or institution registered under section 12AA/12AB of the Act is exempt, subject to fulfilment of certain conditions specified under various sections of the Act. Finance Act, 2023 provided that donations made by a trust...


Comments
CA.UMANG H THAKKER
21-Aug-2014 , 10:14:44 amactually in our representation to CBDT we our self given option to extend time limit for filling audit report. why we had given that option? and if they availed that option we are not eligible to criticize for , it they have adopted this option. what they have done is wrong no doubt about it. but if they exercised the option given by us then we can not say they have done wrong.
BHAT MAJAZ
22-Aug-2014 , 07:44:11 amIt is all because of our Institutes laziness.The colleagues at the helm of affairs seem to increase thire personal network to get more and more assignments at the cost of profession.Bank audits limit is being squesed for CA's,Tax audit under Income TAx and State Sales Tax's scope is reduced for CA's and height of things is CA's are being denied to plead before various tax authorities and in future
BHAT MAJAZ
22-Aug-2014 , 07:46:12 amOur profession has been taken for granted by the people of Income Tax Department And every other Central/State Govt. departments...