News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
HC upholds stricter tax rule on inflow from abroad
The high court here has agreed with the Indian government’s 2013 plan to tax investments from Cyprus, which was used by several foreign investors to avoid taxes in India. The order would impact several foreign institutional investors (FIIs) and private equity investors which invested in India via the Cyprus route.
This clears the way for the government’s decision to impose a 30 per cent tax deduction at source on inflow from Cyprus, a setback for foreign institutional investors. The notification was dated November 2013. Tuesday's court order was from a bench of judges V Ramasubramanian and T Mathivanan.
According to market sources, between 2000 and 2014, inflow via Cyprus into India and Indian stock markets was Rs 38,300 crore.
Pramod Kumar Chopda, standing counsel for the Union ministry of finance, Central Board of Direct Taxes and the I-T department, said the order would be a major step towards controlling undisclosed money.
“Section 94A," said the judges, was "the need of the hour" and suffered no unconstitutionality. It allows the Centre, when there's lack of effective exchange of information with any place outside India, to specify the said country or territory as a notified jurisdictional area for transactions by any assessee.
India and Cyprus did sign an agreement for avoidance of double taxation of income and prevention of fiscal evasion, in force since December 1994. Both agreed to exchange information in this regard, particular for prevention of fraud or evasion of taxes, said the finance ministry in November 2013, when the notification was issued. However, Cyprus had not been providing the information requested under the Agreement. So, it was decided to make Cyprus a notified jurisdictional area.
Three individuals had challenged the section's constitutional validity and the November 2013 notification. There was an October 2014 agreement between an Indian company incorporated in Cyprus and these three individuals, on sales of shares and debentures. Three months after, the petitioners got tax showcause notices. The legal case followed. #casansaar (Business Standard)
This clears the way for the government’s decision to impose a 30 per cent tax deduction at source on inflow from Cyprus, a setback for foreign institutional investors. The notification was dated November 2013. Tuesday's court order was from a bench of judges V Ramasubramanian and T Mathivanan.
According to market sources, between 2000 and 2014, inflow via Cyprus into India and Indian stock markets was Rs 38,300 crore.
Pramod Kumar Chopda, standing counsel for the Union ministry of finance, Central Board of Direct Taxes and the I-T department, said the order would be a major step towards controlling undisclosed money.
“Section 94A," said the judges, was "the need of the hour" and suffered no unconstitutionality. It allows the Centre, when there's lack of effective exchange of information with any place outside India, to specify the said country or territory as a notified jurisdictional area for transactions by any assessee.
India and Cyprus did sign an agreement for avoidance of double taxation of income and prevention of fiscal evasion, in force since December 1994. Both agreed to exchange information in this regard, particular for prevention of fraud or evasion of taxes, said the finance ministry in November 2013, when the notification was issued. However, Cyprus had not been providing the information requested under the Agreement. So, it was decided to make Cyprus a notified jurisdictional area.
Three individuals had challenged the section's constitutional validity and the November 2013 notification. There was an October 2014 agreement between an Indian company incorporated in Cyprus and these three individuals, on sales of shares and debentures. Three months after, the petitioners got tax showcause notices. The legal case followed. #casansaar (Business Standard)
Category : Income Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 632
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments