News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
Income tax department admits error in charging late ITR filing fee
The income tax department has admitted that there has been an inadvertent error while processing income tax returns (ITR) of partners of firms whose accounts are liable to be audited. The taxman has assured that it will rectify the error on its own and remove the late fee charge.
"In a few cases, fee under section 234F has been charged inadvertently in ITRs of Partners due to linkage of filing of Partner's ITR with the filing of ITR of Firm. The same is being rectified suo moto to remove the late fee charged u/s 234F. The inconvenience caused is regretted!" the income tax department said in a tweet.
"Section 234F was introduced to ensure timely filing of returns of income. However, inadvertently, the ITR utility also levied the fees on the partners of the partnership firms, whose due date for ITR filing are linked with that of the partnership firm. Now rectifying the inadvertent error, the Income-tax authorities have decided to remove the penalty charged u/s 234F.
Reversal of the late fee charged under section 234F shall be considered in the computation of amount payable or refund due, as the case may be, on account of processing of the return.
For the financial year 2018-19 (assessment year 2019-20), all working partner of a firm whose accounts are required to be audited were supposed to file their ITR by September 30, 2019 which was later extended to October 31. For those living in Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh, the last date has been further extended to November 30.
For other individual ITR filers, the last date was July 31 but was extended to August 31.
All persons including Individual, HUF, company, partnership firms, etc are liable to pay late filing fees under Section 234F, if the ITR is filed after their respective due dates. For those filing ITR after the due date but within 31 December are charged Rs.5,000 and the penalty increases to Rs.10,000 January onwards. #casansaar (Source - LiveMint)
"In a few cases, fee under section 234F has been charged inadvertently in ITRs of Partners due to linkage of filing of Partner's ITR with the filing of ITR of Firm. The same is being rectified suo moto to remove the late fee charged u/s 234F. The inconvenience caused is regretted!" the income tax department said in a tweet.
"Section 234F was introduced to ensure timely filing of returns of income. However, inadvertently, the ITR utility also levied the fees on the partners of the partnership firms, whose due date for ITR filing are linked with that of the partnership firm. Now rectifying the inadvertent error, the Income-tax authorities have decided to remove the penalty charged u/s 234F.
Reversal of the late fee charged under section 234F shall be considered in the computation of amount payable or refund due, as the case may be, on account of processing of the return.
For the financial year 2018-19 (assessment year 2019-20), all working partner of a firm whose accounts are required to be audited were supposed to file their ITR by September 30, 2019 which was later extended to October 31. For those living in Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh, the last date has been further extended to November 30.
For other individual ITR filers, the last date was July 31 but was extended to August 31.
All persons including Individual, HUF, company, partnership firms, etc are liable to pay late filing fees under Section 234F, if the ITR is filed after their respective due dates. For those filing ITR after the due date but within 31 December are charged Rs.5,000 and the penalty increases to Rs.10,000 January onwards. #casansaar (Source - LiveMint)
Category : Income Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 1085
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments