News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
Mahindra Satyam gets attachment order from Income Tax Department
Mahindra Satyam today said it has received a provisional attachment order from the Income Tax Department attaching land and buildings of the company.
"The company had received a provisional attachment order dated January 30, 2012, from the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT), Central Range -- 3, Hyderabad attaching land and buildings of the company," it said in a filing to the BSE.
The I-T Department had issued notices to the company seeking Rs 617 crore tax for the assessment years from 2003-04 to 2008-09, when the company was run by the founder B Ramalinga Raju and his team.
Subsequently, the company deposited a bank guarantee of Rs 617 crore in last April with the I-T department as directed by the Supreme Court and the bank guarantee furnished was valid until December 31, 2011.
The company said that an interim order from the Andhra Pradesh High Court on January 31 has directed both "Satyam and Income Tax department to maintain status quo."
The said order also directed that the bank guarantee furnished by the company will not be encashed by the Revenue until further orders, it further said.
"Income Tax Department was not allowed to encash the bank guarantee which we had given last year. This why they issued provisional order saying we will attach your properties. This is just provisional order and there nothing substantial which we have received," a Mahindra Satyam spokesperson said.
"The Income tax department should seek court's permission before they issue final notice. We will take legal opinion and move further," the spokesperson added.
Shares of Mahindra Satyam were marginally down at Rs 74.20 on the BSE at 1400 hrs.
Once a leading Indian IT company, Satyam was hit by a multi-crore rupees corporate fraud, admitted by its founder and the then chief B Ramalinga Raju over three years ago. (PTI)
"The company had received a provisional attachment order dated January 30, 2012, from the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT), Central Range -- 3, Hyderabad attaching land and buildings of the company," it said in a filing to the BSE.
The I-T Department had issued notices to the company seeking Rs 617 crore tax for the assessment years from 2003-04 to 2008-09, when the company was run by the founder B Ramalinga Raju and his team.
Subsequently, the company deposited a bank guarantee of Rs 617 crore in last April with the I-T department as directed by the Supreme Court and the bank guarantee furnished was valid until December 31, 2011.
The company said that an interim order from the Andhra Pradesh High Court on January 31 has directed both "Satyam and Income Tax department to maintain status quo."
The said order also directed that the bank guarantee furnished by the company will not be encashed by the Revenue until further orders, it further said.
"Income Tax Department was not allowed to encash the bank guarantee which we had given last year. This why they issued provisional order saying we will attach your properties. This is just provisional order and there nothing substantial which we have received," a Mahindra Satyam spokesperson said.
"The Income tax department should seek court's permission before they issue final notice. We will take legal opinion and move further," the spokesperson added.
Shares of Mahindra Satyam were marginally down at Rs 74.20 on the BSE at 1400 hrs.
Once a leading Indian IT company, Satyam was hit by a multi-crore rupees corporate fraud, admitted by its founder and the then chief B Ramalinga Raju over three years ago. (PTI)
Category : Income Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 289
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments