Possession of scrapped notes to be punishable
PrintListen to this Article
The Bill, to replace the ordinance promulgated on December 30, also provides for a minimum fine Rs 50,000 for false declaration by persons who were abroad during the demonetisation period (November 9-December 30, 2016) and given time to deposit the scrapped notes with RBI till March 31.
Once passed by Parliament, possession of more than 10 pieces of the old notes by individuals and more than 25 pieces for study, research or numismatics purpose will be a criminal offence attracting fine of Rs 10,000 or five times the cash held, whichever is higher.
The Specified Bank Notes (Cessation of Liabilities) Bill, which seeks to end the liability of RBI and the government on the currency notes demonetised in November last, was introduced by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley amid stiff opposition by Trinamool Congress, which called it "illegal" and "anti-national".
Giving rationale behind the legislation, the document placed before Lok Sabha says it is aimed at eliminating the "possibility of running a parallel economy using the scrapped notes.
"There is a possibility of running in a parallel economy by unscrupulous elements with Specified Bank Notes unless the possession of such notes is declared illegal," it said.
The bill states that the government took the demonetisation decision on the recommendations of the RBI's central board to eliminate unaccounted money and fake currency notes from the financial system.
The bill prohibits the holding, transferring or receiving of such notes from December 31, 2016 and seeks to confer power upon the court of a first class Magistrate to impose penalty.
Introduction of the bill was opposed by Trinamool Congress leader Saugata Roy, triggering a banter between him and Jaitley who questioned the ground on which Roy was opposing the move.
Roy then took a jibe at Jaitley, saying the minister was not aware of the Lok Sabha rules as he was never its member.
Jaitley is a member of the Rajya Sabha.
The jibe evoked strong objections from the treasury benches with Parliamentary Affairs Minister Ananth Kumar saying the Finance Minister is an esteemed member of the Cabinet and adjudged outstanding Parliamentarian.
Allowed by Speaker Sumitra Mahajan to express his objection, Roy said the bill is "illegal" as the demonetisation statement made by Prime Minister Narendra Modi was without any notification and it should have come from the RBI as it is the central bank which promises to pay the bearer of a currency note its real value.
"It is outside the minister's legislative competence. It (bill) is anti-national... Having never been a member of this House, he does not understand its rules," he said.
Jaitley said Roy was "incorrect" in several aspects and cited the law under which the demonetisation notification was introduced to asset that the due process was followed.
He then took a counter dig at Roy, saying "It will add to his parliamentary experience as now he is getting to learn."
The issue of demonetisation had virtually washed out the Winter session. #casansaar (PTI)
Category : Income Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 260
If you earn income other than salary or have multiple income streams, the advance tax deadline falling today—Monday, December 15, 2025—should not be overlooked. Failure to pay advance tax on time, or paying less than the required amount, may attract interest charges that continue to accumulate. As the Income Tax Act operates on a “pay as you earn” basis, being aware of advance tax provisions and the financial impact of delays can help you avoid unnecessary costs and last-...
If you earn income other than salary or have multiple income streams, the advance tax deadline falling today—Monday, December 15, 2025—should not be overlooked. Failure to pay advance tax on time, or paying less than the required amount, may attract interest charges that continue to accumulate. As the Income Tax Act operates on a “pay as you earn” basis, being aware of advance tax provisions and the financial impact of delays can help you avoid unnecessary costs and last-...
As many as 5,44,205 appeals were pending resolution with the Income Tax (IT) Department at commissioner (appeals) level as of January 31 this year, and 63,246 at various Income Tax Appellate Tribunals (ITATs), High Courts, and the Supreme Court, FE has learnt. To be precise, the cases pending in ITATs were 20,266 High Courts, 37,436; and Supreme Court 5,544. The large pendency is even as the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has laid emphasis on disposing of income tax appeals in its 10...
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has facilitated taxpayers to file their Income Tax Returns (ITRs) for the Assessment Year 2024-25 (relevant to Financial Year 2023-24) from 1st April, 2024 onwards. The ITR functionalities i.e. ITR-1, ITR-2 and ITR-4, commonly used by taxpayers are available on the e-filing portal from 1st April, 2024 onwards for taxpayers to file their Returns. Companies will also be able to file their ITRs through ITR-6 from April 1 onwards. As ...
It has come to notice that misleading information related to new tax regime is being spread on some social media platforms. It is therefore clarified that the new regime under section 115BAC(1A) was introduced in the Finance Act 2023 which was as under as compared to the existing old regime (without exemptions): New Regime 115BAC (1A) introduced for FY 2023-24 Existing old Regime 0-3 lacs 0% 0-2.5 lacs 0% ...
Comments