News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
Financial service providers outside the purview of IBC - NCLAT
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) and NCLT (Mumbai Bench), in recent judgments, have observed that financial service providers such as non-banking financial companies are outside the purview of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy (I&B) Code.
In an order in the Randhiraj Thakur, Director, Mayfair Capital Private Ltd versus Jindal Saxena Financial Services and Mayfair Capital Private Ltd, NCLAT said the Adjudicating Authority failed to notice the provisions relating to I&B Code and passed the impugned order dated January 8, 2018, initiating ‘insolvency corporate resolution process’ against Mayfair Capital Pvt Ltd, a financial service provider (non-banking financial company).
“Mayfair Capital Pvt Ltd had undertaken a financial service by accepting deposit from Jindal Saxena Financial Services Private Limited (first respondent) in terms of Section 3(16) of the I&B Code. Therefore, it cannot be held that the amount was accepted towards public deposits.
“For the said reason, in regard to the transaction, in quest, Mayfair Capital Pvt Ltd cannot be treated as ‘Corporate Debtor,’ as per the judgment.
Mayfair Capital Pvt Ltd (second respondent) being a financial service provider and having been excluded from the definition of ‘corporate person’ under sub-section (7) of Section 3 of the I&B Code, the application under Section 7 was not maintainable against Mayfair Capital Pvt Ltd, said the judgment. “The application preferred by the first respondent under Section 7 of the I&B Code is dismissed. The Adjudicating Authority will now close the proceeding. The second respondent company is released from all the rigour of law and is allowed to function independently through its board of directors with immediate effect,” said Justice SJ Mukhopadhaya and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat.
In the Union of India versus IL&FS case, the NCLT, on October 12, said that currently the legal framework does not facilitate making of the necessary application under the I&B Code for resolution of IL&FS as the code does not address resolution relating to financial service providers. #casansaar (Source - The Hindu Business)
In an order in the Randhiraj Thakur, Director, Mayfair Capital Private Ltd versus Jindal Saxena Financial Services and Mayfair Capital Private Ltd, NCLAT said the Adjudicating Authority failed to notice the provisions relating to I&B Code and passed the impugned order dated January 8, 2018, initiating ‘insolvency corporate resolution process’ against Mayfair Capital Pvt Ltd, a financial service provider (non-banking financial company).
“Mayfair Capital Pvt Ltd had undertaken a financial service by accepting deposit from Jindal Saxena Financial Services Private Limited (first respondent) in terms of Section 3(16) of the I&B Code. Therefore, it cannot be held that the amount was accepted towards public deposits.
“For the said reason, in regard to the transaction, in quest, Mayfair Capital Pvt Ltd cannot be treated as ‘Corporate Debtor,’ as per the judgment.
Mayfair Capital Pvt Ltd (second respondent) being a financial service provider and having been excluded from the definition of ‘corporate person’ under sub-section (7) of Section 3 of the I&B Code, the application under Section 7 was not maintainable against Mayfair Capital Pvt Ltd, said the judgment. “The application preferred by the first respondent under Section 7 of the I&B Code is dismissed. The Adjudicating Authority will now close the proceeding. The second respondent company is released from all the rigour of law and is allowed to function independently through its board of directors with immediate effect,” said Justice SJ Mukhopadhaya and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat.
In the Union of India versus IL&FS case, the NCLT, on October 12, said that currently the legal framework does not facilitate making of the necessary application under the I&B Code for resolution of IL&FS as the code does not address resolution relating to financial service providers. #casansaar (Source - The Hindu Business)
Category : Insolvent Professional | Comments : 0 | Hits : 654
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments