News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
IBBI suspends registration of IRP demanding exorbitant fees
Sending a strong signal, insolvency regulator IBBI’s Disciplinary Committee (DC) has suspended the registration of an insolvency resolution professional (IRP) Bhavna Sanjay Ruia for one year for charging an exorbitant fee.
This move came after the Committee concluded that Ruia, who is enrolled as a professional member of ICSI Institute of Insolvency Professionals, had engaged in acts that “brought disrepute to the noble profession of IP and severely compromised her status as fit and proper person”.
The DC sincerely expects Ruia to use this one year to strengthen her competency and ethical standards, said an IBBI order now made public. She has attempted to mislead the stakeholders, the IBBI Board and the DC by a series of misrepresentation of facts, according to the order.
As an insolvency resolution professional in Madhucon Projects Ltd case, she had in aggregate quoted a total fee of about ₹14 crore (including initial fee of ₹5 crore), apart from other incidental expenses.
This was done when the total outstanding debt amount from the corporate debtor (Madhucon Projects) was only Rs.4.16 crore (including interest and retention money).
The Adjudicating Authority noted that the remuneration for Managing Director and CEO and two whole-time directors works out to ₹1.10 crore a year, whereas the proposed IRP had quoted an “exorbitant” amount.
“The Adjudicating Authority is of the considered view that remuneration quoted by the IRP is quite exorbitant and the same needs to be referred to IBBI. Though there are no prescribed set of rules and regulations/guidelines at present with regard to the fee payable to the IRP/RP, the Authority is of the considered view that the fee quoted by the professionals should be reasonable, commensurate with the work handled”.
It, therefore, recommended the matter to IBBI to take appropriate action/remedial measure against the proposed IRP including disciplinary action, if any, as deemed fit. #casansaar (Source - IBBI, The Hindu Business)
This move came after the Committee concluded that Ruia, who is enrolled as a professional member of ICSI Institute of Insolvency Professionals, had engaged in acts that “brought disrepute to the noble profession of IP and severely compromised her status as fit and proper person”.
The DC sincerely expects Ruia to use this one year to strengthen her competency and ethical standards, said an IBBI order now made public. She has attempted to mislead the stakeholders, the IBBI Board and the DC by a series of misrepresentation of facts, according to the order.
As an insolvency resolution professional in Madhucon Projects Ltd case, she had in aggregate quoted a total fee of about ₹14 crore (including initial fee of ₹5 crore), apart from other incidental expenses.
This was done when the total outstanding debt amount from the corporate debtor (Madhucon Projects) was only Rs.4.16 crore (including interest and retention money).
The Adjudicating Authority noted that the remuneration for Managing Director and CEO and two whole-time directors works out to ₹1.10 crore a year, whereas the proposed IRP had quoted an “exorbitant” amount.
“The Adjudicating Authority is of the considered view that remuneration quoted by the IRP is quite exorbitant and the same needs to be referred to IBBI. Though there are no prescribed set of rules and regulations/guidelines at present with regard to the fee payable to the IRP/RP, the Authority is of the considered view that the fee quoted by the professionals should be reasonable, commensurate with the work handled”.
It, therefore, recommended the matter to IBBI to take appropriate action/remedial measure against the proposed IRP including disciplinary action, if any, as deemed fit. #casansaar (Source - IBBI, The Hindu Business)
Category : Insolvent Professional | Comments : 0 | Hits : 902
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments