News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
NCLAT allows lenders to meet and finalise Bhushan Power bid
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) today gave a go-ahead to the lenders' meeting of debt-ridden Bhushan Power & Steel (BPSL), directing it to finalise a bid for the company.
Vacating its earlier stay, the appellate tribunal has directed the committee of creditors (CoC) of the company to consider the resolution plans submitted by three firms -- Tata Steel, Liberty House and JSW Steel.
NCLAT has also directed the CoC to call all the three bidders, along with operational creditors and suspended board of directors, in the meeting.
The CoC would call for urgent meeting to take the resolution plan for discussion and approval, said a two-member bench headed by Chairman Justice S J Mukhopadhaya.
He further said, "Resolution professional (RP), after consulting CoC, will invite operational creditors and all three resolution applicants will remain present on the date of consideration of the resolution plan.
The suspended board of director are also allowed to attend the meetings in which resolution plan will be considered by CoC, NCLAT said in its orders.
Earlier, on July 17, NCLAT had stayed the meeting of CoC when they were going to vote for finalisation of the highest bidder (H1) for BPSL.
The best of the three plans, which are in consonance with section 30(2) and are viable, feasible and acceptable to majority of CoC be voted on the same or subsequent date to approve, said NCLAT.
It further said, "The CoC may also indicate the second best plan (H2) so that in future the adjudicating authority can approve in case of any problems with the first resolution plan.
The appellate tribunal further said that CoC will place selected resolution plan before adjudicating authority, which may approve it, but they will not give effect without prior approval of this tribunal (NCLAT).
Today, during the proceedings of the appellate tribunal, RP tendered an unconditional apology. However, NCLAT said it would hear it whenever the date comes.
The appellate tribunal has directed to list the matter on August 1 for next hearing.
During the last hearing on July 17, NCLAT had pulled up the RP of the company, Mahendra Kumar Khandelwal, for not following its previous orders to allow the representatives of operational creditors to attend the meeting.
It had said that it would consider whether contempt of court proceedings should be initiated against the RP in the next hearing, which was today.
In the last hearing, operational creditors of the company had alleged that their representatives were not allowed to attend the CoC meeting.
Moreover, Liberty House, a resolution applicant has alleged that information was not supplied about the meeting and on July 11 RP gave a 19-page checklist seeking the company's compliance on 29 A of Insovency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
Earlier, the company's lenders had rejected the resolution plan submitted by Liberty House citing delay, following which the UK-based group had moved the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).
The NCLT had on April 23 directed BPSL's lenders, led by PNB, to consider the bid submitted by Liberty House.
This order was later challenged by Tata Steel, another resolution applicant of BPSL, before NCLAT -- the appellate tribunal. #casansaar (Source - PTI)
Vacating its earlier stay, the appellate tribunal has directed the committee of creditors (CoC) of the company to consider the resolution plans submitted by three firms -- Tata Steel, Liberty House and JSW Steel.
NCLAT has also directed the CoC to call all the three bidders, along with operational creditors and suspended board of directors, in the meeting.
The CoC would call for urgent meeting to take the resolution plan for discussion and approval, said a two-member bench headed by Chairman Justice S J Mukhopadhaya.
He further said, "Resolution professional (RP), after consulting CoC, will invite operational creditors and all three resolution applicants will remain present on the date of consideration of the resolution plan.
The suspended board of director are also allowed to attend the meetings in which resolution plan will be considered by CoC, NCLAT said in its orders.
Earlier, on July 17, NCLAT had stayed the meeting of CoC when they were going to vote for finalisation of the highest bidder (H1) for BPSL.
The best of the three plans, which are in consonance with section 30(2) and are viable, feasible and acceptable to majority of CoC be voted on the same or subsequent date to approve, said NCLAT.
It further said, "The CoC may also indicate the second best plan (H2) so that in future the adjudicating authority can approve in case of any problems with the first resolution plan.
The appellate tribunal further said that CoC will place selected resolution plan before adjudicating authority, which may approve it, but they will not give effect without prior approval of this tribunal (NCLAT).
Today, during the proceedings of the appellate tribunal, RP tendered an unconditional apology. However, NCLAT said it would hear it whenever the date comes.
The appellate tribunal has directed to list the matter on August 1 for next hearing.
During the last hearing on July 17, NCLAT had pulled up the RP of the company, Mahendra Kumar Khandelwal, for not following its previous orders to allow the representatives of operational creditors to attend the meeting.
It had said that it would consider whether contempt of court proceedings should be initiated against the RP in the next hearing, which was today.
In the last hearing, operational creditors of the company had alleged that their representatives were not allowed to attend the CoC meeting.
Moreover, Liberty House, a resolution applicant has alleged that information was not supplied about the meeting and on July 11 RP gave a 19-page checklist seeking the company's compliance on 29 A of Insovency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
Earlier, the company's lenders had rejected the resolution plan submitted by Liberty House citing delay, following which the UK-based group had moved the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).
The NCLT had on April 23 directed BPSL's lenders, led by PNB, to consider the bid submitted by Liberty House.
This order was later challenged by Tata Steel, another resolution applicant of BPSL, before NCLAT -- the appellate tribunal. #casansaar (Source - PTI)
Category : Insolvent Professional | Comments : 0 | Hits : 524
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments