News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
SC asks NCLT to deal with insolvency proceedings against Jaypee group
In a setback to the Jaypee group, the Supreme Court on Thurssday, August 9, 2018, asked the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Allahabad, to deal with the insolvency proceedings against Jaypee Infratech Ltd (JIL) and barred the group or its promoters from participating in the fresh bidding process.
A bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra said the limitation period of 180 days to conclude the insolvency proceedings will commence from Thursday, August 9, 2018.
The bench, also comprising Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and D.Y. Chandrachud, said the ₹750 crore deposited by the JIL in the apex court shall be transferred to NCLT Allahabad.
The top court also allowed the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to direct the banks to initiate separate insolvency proceedings against JIL’s holding company Jaiprakash Associate Limited (JAL).
The bench while disposing of all the petitions and applications pending before it, said the home buyers should be included in the committee of creditors in accordance with the amendments made in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
The apex court had earlier reserved its order on “interim reliefs” sought by various stakeholders, including the home buyers of JIL, JAL, banks and financial institutions and the Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP).
IDBI bank had moved the Corporate Insolvency Resolution application before the NCLT against the debt-ridden realty firm, JIL, after it allegedly defaulted in paying back a loan of ₹526 crore.
The ASG had earlier said that, according to the amended IBC, now home buyers are financial creditors in a firm. Hence, the committee of creditors, which usually included banks and FIs, will have to consider the views of home buyers while deciding the resolution plan of a company.
Lawyers, representing the home buyers, opposed the submission that JAL be allowed to complete the housing projects, saying that it was barred under the law to do so.
Taking note of the enormity of the situation, the bench said it was thought that the liability of the firm was to the tune ₹2,000 crore and it has now gone beyond ₹30,000 crore.
Earlier, JAL had said it would deposit ₹ 600 crore more to refund the home buyers if it was allowed to dispose of its identified assets, including a cement plant at Rewa in Madhya Pradesh.
JAL had said ₹ 750 crore has been deposited by it with the apex court’s registry and ₹ 600 crore more would be required for paying the principal sum to the home buyers.
The home buyers had moved the apex court stating that around 32,000 people had booked flats and were now paying instalments.#casansaar (Source - PTI, The Hindu)
A bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra said the limitation period of 180 days to conclude the insolvency proceedings will commence from Thursday, August 9, 2018.
The bench, also comprising Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and D.Y. Chandrachud, said the ₹750 crore deposited by the JIL in the apex court shall be transferred to NCLT Allahabad.
The top court also allowed the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to direct the banks to initiate separate insolvency proceedings against JIL’s holding company Jaiprakash Associate Limited (JAL).
The bench while disposing of all the petitions and applications pending before it, said the home buyers should be included in the committee of creditors in accordance with the amendments made in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
The apex court had earlier reserved its order on “interim reliefs” sought by various stakeholders, including the home buyers of JIL, JAL, banks and financial institutions and the Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP).
IDBI bank had moved the Corporate Insolvency Resolution application before the NCLT against the debt-ridden realty firm, JIL, after it allegedly defaulted in paying back a loan of ₹526 crore.
The ASG had earlier said that, according to the amended IBC, now home buyers are financial creditors in a firm. Hence, the committee of creditors, which usually included banks and FIs, will have to consider the views of home buyers while deciding the resolution plan of a company.
Lawyers, representing the home buyers, opposed the submission that JAL be allowed to complete the housing projects, saying that it was barred under the law to do so.
Taking note of the enormity of the situation, the bench said it was thought that the liability of the firm was to the tune ₹2,000 crore and it has now gone beyond ₹30,000 crore.
Earlier, JAL had said it would deposit ₹ 600 crore more to refund the home buyers if it was allowed to dispose of its identified assets, including a cement plant at Rewa in Madhya Pradesh.
JAL had said ₹ 750 crore has been deposited by it with the apex court’s registry and ₹ 600 crore more would be required for paying the principal sum to the home buyers.
The home buyers had moved the apex court stating that around 32,000 people had booked flats and were now paying instalments.#casansaar (Source - PTI, The Hindu)
Category : Insolvent Professional | Comments : 0 | Hits : 881
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments