News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
SC exempts retrospective petitions from IBC amendment
The Supreme court of India on Monday gave a status quo order regarding the amendment of section 3 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code that homebuyers set stringent conditions for individual financial creditors to approach the bankruptcy court. The Monday's order by the SC has exempted the petitions that were filed before December 28th from the amendment.
"SC has granted a partial stay on the 3rd proviso of Section 3 today and issued notice to the Union of India. This means that all the petitions that were filed before the Amendment shall not be bound by the 30 day- period given to satisfy the amendment," said advocate Srijan Sinha, who is representing the association of Karvy investors.
The order also gives relief to over 100 individual homebuyers and investors who had filed petitions for recovery in several NCLTs.
Last week the association of investors in a Karvy Group scheme had challenged the constitutional validity of Section 3 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code that said that the courts will accept an insolvency petition in case of real estate bankruptcy only if 100 home buyers or 10% of the total home buyers came together to file a petition. The amendment for this had come up on December 28th. The Karvy Investors group had appealed for a modification of this amendment that said the retrospective application of this rule will impact the investors.
“This amendment is a discrimination between financial institutions and individual investors. Our prayer is that we should be treated in parity with financial institutions.” Sinha added.
The petitioner association comprises members who have made several investments on the aid and advice of Karvy group of companies, in various types of investment schemes that were floated by private companies. The association claims that its members were financial creditors as per the definition provided by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.#casansaar (Source - PTI, Economic Times, SC)
"SC has granted a partial stay on the 3rd proviso of Section 3 today and issued notice to the Union of India. This means that all the petitions that were filed before the Amendment shall not be bound by the 30 day- period given to satisfy the amendment," said advocate Srijan Sinha, who is representing the association of Karvy investors.
The order also gives relief to over 100 individual homebuyers and investors who had filed petitions for recovery in several NCLTs.
Last week the association of investors in a Karvy Group scheme had challenged the constitutional validity of Section 3 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code that said that the courts will accept an insolvency petition in case of real estate bankruptcy only if 100 home buyers or 10% of the total home buyers came together to file a petition. The amendment for this had come up on December 28th. The Karvy Investors group had appealed for a modification of this amendment that said the retrospective application of this rule will impact the investors.
“This amendment is a discrimination between financial institutions and individual investors. Our prayer is that we should be treated in parity with financial institutions.” Sinha added.
The petitioner association comprises members who have made several investments on the aid and advice of Karvy group of companies, in various types of investment schemes that were floated by private companies. The association claims that its members were financial creditors as per the definition provided by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.#casansaar (Source - PTI, Economic Times, SC)
Category : Insolvent Professional | Comments : 0 | Hits : 516
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments