News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
SC move to split pleas challenging constitutional validity of IBC
Banks have got more time to resolve stressed assets as the Supreme Court has asked the parties to segregate all petitions related to the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) February 12 circular in to two buckets — those challenging the constitutional validity of insolvency proceedings and those challenging the regulator’s circular on stressed assets.
The matter has been fixed for segregation of cases on Friday while the hearing will be held at a later date, sources said. “The matters related to validity of IBC proceedings challenged by South Indian Sugar Mills Association and Bhushan SteelNSE -0.54 % & Power will be heard first and then petitions challenging the RBI circular will be taken up,” they said.
The Supreme Court had on September 11halted insolvency proceedings against defaulters in the power, sugar, shipping and textile sectors by staying the RBI circular. The bench, comprising Justices RF Nariman and Indu Malhotra, directed parties to maintain status quo while transferring about a dozen cases on the matter in various lower courts to itself.
“The court directed that a list of all matters pertaining to the RBI circular be handed over to it. Based on the list, matters would be segregated into IBC challenge matters and RBI circular matters. The court will fix a date for hearing for both batches on Friday and indicated that the IBC matters will be taken up first,” they said.
Private power companies and bank employees union have challenged the controversial circular saying it is ultra vires the RBI Act as it infringes lenders’ discretion to move defaulting loan accounts. The RBI circular mandated lenders to initiate insolvency proceedings against all defaulters after August 27.
Industry experts said this will give banks more time to resolve stressed assets that they wish to settle outside bankruptcy court.
Association of Power Producers director-general Ashok Khurana said, “This provides time to bankers to finalise the pending resolution plans of about 13 GW. As we understand from bankers, the main stumbling block in resolving this capacity is the requirement of 100% approval of lenders. This condition must be aligned to IBC code wherein the government amended Section 12(2) of IBC and brought down the threshold of approval to 66%. Only this change in RBI circular will help in expeditious resolution of these 13 GW plants.”
In case of stressed power assets, banks have not been able to close deals for none of the 13 GW power projects for which resolution proceedings were initiated a few months ago.
Cases like the 600-mw Jhabua power plant of Avantha Power and Prayagraj Power Gen Corp’s 1980-mw Bara power plant, both in Madhya Pradesh, looked closest to resolution but resolutions could not be finalised due to lack of consensus among bankers. No headway has been made in long pending resolution proposal of projects like 1,320-mw RattanIndia Amravati plant in Maharashtra and 1370-mw GMR Chhattisgarh Energy Ltd. #casansaar (Source - Economic Times)
The matter has been fixed for segregation of cases on Friday while the hearing will be held at a later date, sources said. “The matters related to validity of IBC proceedings challenged by South Indian Sugar Mills Association and Bhushan SteelNSE -0.54 % & Power will be heard first and then petitions challenging the RBI circular will be taken up,” they said.
The Supreme Court had on September 11halted insolvency proceedings against defaulters in the power, sugar, shipping and textile sectors by staying the RBI circular. The bench, comprising Justices RF Nariman and Indu Malhotra, directed parties to maintain status quo while transferring about a dozen cases on the matter in various lower courts to itself.
“The court directed that a list of all matters pertaining to the RBI circular be handed over to it. Based on the list, matters would be segregated into IBC challenge matters and RBI circular matters. The court will fix a date for hearing for both batches on Friday and indicated that the IBC matters will be taken up first,” they said.
Private power companies and bank employees union have challenged the controversial circular saying it is ultra vires the RBI Act as it infringes lenders’ discretion to move defaulting loan accounts. The RBI circular mandated lenders to initiate insolvency proceedings against all defaulters after August 27.
Industry experts said this will give banks more time to resolve stressed assets that they wish to settle outside bankruptcy court.
Association of Power Producers director-general Ashok Khurana said, “This provides time to bankers to finalise the pending resolution plans of about 13 GW. As we understand from bankers, the main stumbling block in resolving this capacity is the requirement of 100% approval of lenders. This condition must be aligned to IBC code wherein the government amended Section 12(2) of IBC and brought down the threshold of approval to 66%. Only this change in RBI circular will help in expeditious resolution of these 13 GW plants.”
In case of stressed power assets, banks have not been able to close deals for none of the 13 GW power projects for which resolution proceedings were initiated a few months ago.
Cases like the 600-mw Jhabua power plant of Avantha Power and Prayagraj Power Gen Corp’s 1980-mw Bara power plant, both in Madhya Pradesh, looked closest to resolution but resolutions could not be finalised due to lack of consensus among bankers. No headway has been made in long pending resolution proposal of projects like 1,320-mw RattanIndia Amravati plant in Maharashtra and 1370-mw GMR Chhattisgarh Energy Ltd. #casansaar (Source - Economic Times)
Category : Insolvent Professional | Comments : 0 | Hits : 415
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments