News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
Supreme Court seeks govt response on plea challenging IBC validity
The Supreme Court has sought response from the government on a petition challenging the validity of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2020 that introduced a threshold of at least 10% of homebuyers in a project or 100 of the total allottees for initiating insolvency proceedings against the real estate developer.
A Bench led by Justice RF Nariman issued notice to the ministries of finance, law and corporate affairs on a petition filed by the Association of Karvy Investors, challenging the recent Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2020 on the ground that it is “manifestly arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution”.
The apex court also asked parties to maintain a status quo with regard to the pending applications filed by homebuyers with the NCLT for initiating insolvency proceedings against developers.
The new law says that homebuyers looking to take a developer to an insolvency court will have to ensure that a minimum of 100 or 10% of the total allottees of a project were part of a joint petition seeking initiation of insolvency proceedings against the builder.
Challenging Sections 3 & 10 of the Act, counsel Srijan Sinha argued said that the new law was in violation of Articles 14 (equality before law) of the Constitution as it had rendered buyers, who are financial creditors, remediless and also subjected them to discrimination by putting a pre-condition in the form of a minimum number of allottees of a particular project required for filing an application under Section 7 of the IBC for initiation of the IRP. #casansaar (Source - Financial Express)
A Bench led by Justice RF Nariman issued notice to the ministries of finance, law and corporate affairs on a petition filed by the Association of Karvy Investors, challenging the recent Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2020 on the ground that it is “manifestly arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution”.
The apex court also asked parties to maintain a status quo with regard to the pending applications filed by homebuyers with the NCLT for initiating insolvency proceedings against developers.
The new law says that homebuyers looking to take a developer to an insolvency court will have to ensure that a minimum of 100 or 10% of the total allottees of a project were part of a joint petition seeking initiation of insolvency proceedings against the builder.
Challenging Sections 3 & 10 of the Act, counsel Srijan Sinha argued said that the new law was in violation of Articles 14 (equality before law) of the Constitution as it had rendered buyers, who are financial creditors, remediless and also subjected them to discrimination by putting a pre-condition in the form of a minimum number of allottees of a particular project required for filing an application under Section 7 of the IBC for initiation of the IRP. #casansaar (Source - Financial Express)
Category : Insolvent Professional | Comments : 0 | Hits : 338
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments