News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
Supreme Court upholds Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code in its entirety
The Supreme Court of India upheld the two-year old insolvency code in its entirety, quashing petitions which challenged the law saying it was discriminatory.
The two-judge bench headed by Justice Rohinton Nariman also upheld the ban on promoters’ bids for the defaulting company undergoing the insolvency process. Today’s judgment will boost a clean credit culture, said Rajiv Kumar, secretary at the Department of Financial Services.
The ruling will help recover Rs 1.8 lakh crore in the current financial year, he said. The apex court was hearing a batch of petitions that had challenged the constitutional validity of IBC under Article 14 of the Constitution.
Several operational creditors had argued that IBC doesn’t make an intelligible differentia in the classification of a financial creditor and operational creditor, and hence violates Article 14. Operational creditors had argued that they provide services to companies and while they have the right to initiate insolvency proceedings if their payments are defaulted upon, the code bars them for participating in the resolution process through the committee of creditors.
Under IBC, the committee can only consist of financial creditors who assess and vote on resolution plans submitted by interested bidders. The second important argument was that by barring promoters from bidding for their own companies, IBC forces the sale of the company to new bidders. This, the petitioners had argued, is against the fundamental rights of promoters of a company.
The apex court dismissed both these arguments. Former Attorney General of India and Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi was among the lawyers appearing for the petitioners challenging the law. The top court had reserved its judgment on Jan. 16. #casansaar (Source - Bloomberg)
The two-judge bench headed by Justice Rohinton Nariman also upheld the ban on promoters’ bids for the defaulting company undergoing the insolvency process. Today’s judgment will boost a clean credit culture, said Rajiv Kumar, secretary at the Department of Financial Services.
The ruling will help recover Rs 1.8 lakh crore in the current financial year, he said. The apex court was hearing a batch of petitions that had challenged the constitutional validity of IBC under Article 14 of the Constitution.
Several operational creditors had argued that IBC doesn’t make an intelligible differentia in the classification of a financial creditor and operational creditor, and hence violates Article 14. Operational creditors had argued that they provide services to companies and while they have the right to initiate insolvency proceedings if their payments are defaulted upon, the code bars them for participating in the resolution process through the committee of creditors.
Under IBC, the committee can only consist of financial creditors who assess and vote on resolution plans submitted by interested bidders. The second important argument was that by barring promoters from bidding for their own companies, IBC forces the sale of the company to new bidders. This, the petitioners had argued, is against the fundamental rights of promoters of a company.
The apex court dismissed both these arguments. Former Attorney General of India and Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi was among the lawyers appearing for the petitioners challenging the law. The top court had reserved its judgment on Jan. 16. #casansaar (Source - Bloomberg)
Category : Insolvent Professional | Comments : 0 | Hits : 555
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments