News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
SC to examine disclosure of names in NPAs
The central government on Monday told the Supreme Court that anexpert committee it had appointed on non-performing assets will submitits report this month end and the court must hold its hand till then for furtherexamination of the problem which plagues the banking sector.
The court, however, stated that it would take up the question of disclosure of the names of the defaulters on Friday. The Centre for Public Interest Litigation has moved the court for the disclosure. Its counsel Prashant Bhushan told the bench headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur that the expert committee report would not be reliable as its five members are thevery people involved in reckless lending.
The actual NPA is to the tune of Rs 3 lakh crore and those which were restructured and given more time to repay is not less than Rs 10 lakh crore, counsel said.
The Chief Justice separated the consideration of the coming report on NPAs from the demand for disclosure. The report will be examined next month. But the court asked the RBI counsel what was the difficulty in disclosing the serious defaulters’ names. Its counsel replied that the principle of confidentiality and statutory limitations must be respected.
Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar, appearing for the government, said that that it was for the banks to disclose the names and the government was not involved in that issue.
Prashant Bhushan submitted that last year the Supreme Court had dismissed the appeal of the RBI which claimed immunity from disclosing the names. In spite of that neither the government nor the RBI has obeyed the order of the court. He said that the banks and the government could not raise arguments based on confidentiality and statutory limitations as the judgment had rejected each of the arguments.
The court and the general public have a right to know the names, not only under the Right to Information Act, but also when the authorities are colluding with the guilty parties to cover up the swindle of public money. #casansaar (Source - Business Standard)
The court, however, stated that it would take up the question of disclosure of the names of the defaulters on Friday. The Centre for Public Interest Litigation has moved the court for the disclosure. Its counsel Prashant Bhushan told the bench headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur that the expert committee report would not be reliable as its five members are thevery people involved in reckless lending.
The actual NPA is to the tune of Rs 3 lakh crore and those which were restructured and given more time to repay is not less than Rs 10 lakh crore, counsel said.
The Chief Justice separated the consideration of the coming report on NPAs from the demand for disclosure. The report will be examined next month. But the court asked the RBI counsel what was the difficulty in disclosing the serious defaulters’ names. Its counsel replied that the principle of confidentiality and statutory limitations must be respected.
Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar, appearing for the government, said that that it was for the banks to disclose the names and the government was not involved in that issue.
Prashant Bhushan submitted that last year the Supreme Court had dismissed the appeal of the RBI which claimed immunity from disclosing the names. In spite of that neither the government nor the RBI has obeyed the order of the court. He said that the banks and the government could not raise arguments based on confidentiality and statutory limitations as the judgment had rejected each of the arguments.
The court and the general public have a right to know the names, not only under the Right to Information Act, but also when the authorities are colluding with the guilty parties to cover up the swindle of public money. #casansaar (Source - Business Standard)
Category : NPA | Comments : 0 | Hits : 459
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments