News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
HC issues notice to PayTM, RBI on company's postpaid wallet service
The Delhi High Court on Monday notices to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and PayTM, seeking their response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) which claims that the digital payment company is violating the banking rules by operating a post-paid wallet. A division bench led by Chief Justice Rajendra Menon was hearing the PIL which has alleged that though PayTM has a payments bank licence, it is not allowed to facilitate credit disbursement or loan facilities to customers.
PayTM’s post-paid service allows users certain credit limit based on their transactions and allows them to pay back the amount without interest within a period of 30 plus 7 days. This, the petitioner has alleged, is in violation of the Section 1.6 of RBI’s Operating Guidelines for Payments Bank which puts restrictions on loans and advances to customers.
The petitioner also claims that PayTM has not informed RBI about the operation of a post-paid wallet service and thus is also in violation of its rules which mandate informing the regulator about operations of payment banks.
Apart from this, the PIL also alleges that since the post-paid wallet services of the company are managed by a third party vendor named Clix Finance India Private Limited, the information shared by PayTM with it stands in violation of article 21 of the constitution which enshrines privacy as a fundamental right.
“PayTM Payments Bank is deceitfully sharing the personal information of the customers with their authorisation / knowledge to the third party,” the petitioner has alleged.
In June last year, the PayTM Payments Bank Limited was asked to stop adding new customers after an audit by the RBI found glitches in the Know Your Customer process of the bank. Later on December 31, the company was given a go ahead to resume the process after complying with RBI norms and getting a formal go ahead by the regulator. Payments banks can accept deposits from individuals and small businesses up to Rs 1 lakh per account. #casansaar (Source - Business Standard)
PayTM’s post-paid service allows users certain credit limit based on their transactions and allows them to pay back the amount without interest within a period of 30 plus 7 days. This, the petitioner has alleged, is in violation of the Section 1.6 of RBI’s Operating Guidelines for Payments Bank which puts restrictions on loans and advances to customers.
The petitioner also claims that PayTM has not informed RBI about the operation of a post-paid wallet service and thus is also in violation of its rules which mandate informing the regulator about operations of payment banks.
Apart from this, the PIL also alleges that since the post-paid wallet services of the company are managed by a third party vendor named Clix Finance India Private Limited, the information shared by PayTM with it stands in violation of article 21 of the constitution which enshrines privacy as a fundamental right.
“PayTM Payments Bank is deceitfully sharing the personal information of the customers with their authorisation / knowledge to the third party,” the petitioner has alleged.
In June last year, the PayTM Payments Bank Limited was asked to stop adding new customers after an audit by the RBI found glitches in the Know Your Customer process of the bank. Later on December 31, the company was given a go ahead to resume the process after complying with RBI norms and getting a formal go ahead by the regulator. Payments banks can accept deposits from individuals and small businesses up to Rs 1 lakh per account. #casansaar (Source - Business Standard)
Category : RBI | Comments : 0 | Hits : 536
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments