News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
SC to Govt-Why can't RBI accept scrapped notes till March 31
The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the Centre to file a response to a plea challenging the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) refusal to accept demonetized Rs500 and Rs1,000 notes post 31 December, 2016.
A bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) J.S. Khehar gave the government two weeks to file a response.
The petitioners—three individuals and Victory Logitrans Pvt. Ltd, a Bengaluru-based transport company—claimed that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had in his speech on 7 November said that any person who is unable to deposit the old banknotes before 31 December 2016 can do so at specific branches of RBI up to 31 March, 2017.
“The PM’s speech is irrelevant,” the government’s top law officer, attorney general Mukul Rohatgi, said.
He argued that the statutory notification issued on 8 November, 2016 had been superseded by a later ordinance issued on 30 December.
Also Read | How sticky are cash deposits made in banks as a result of demonetisation?
“The notification does not create any rights and is anyway replaced by the ordinance,” Rohatgi said.
“Everyone knew the PM’s speech but nobody saw the ordinance coming,” the court said in an oral observation.
In an earlier hearing, the government had sought to argue the case directly without filing a reply to claims made in the petition.
As per its ‘facility for exchange of specified bank notes during the grace period’ notification dated 31 December 2016, the RBI stated that old banknotes could be exchanged only by those who were not in India between 8 November and 31 December 2016.
It also fixed a Rs25,000 cap for non-resident Indians to deposit scrapped currency.
The case will be heard next on 11 April.#casansaar (PTI - LiveMint)
A bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) J.S. Khehar gave the government two weeks to file a response.
The petitioners—three individuals and Victory Logitrans Pvt. Ltd, a Bengaluru-based transport company—claimed that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had in his speech on 7 November said that any person who is unable to deposit the old banknotes before 31 December 2016 can do so at specific branches of RBI up to 31 March, 2017.
“The PM’s speech is irrelevant,” the government’s top law officer, attorney general Mukul Rohatgi, said.
He argued that the statutory notification issued on 8 November, 2016 had been superseded by a later ordinance issued on 30 December.
Also Read | How sticky are cash deposits made in banks as a result of demonetisation?
“The notification does not create any rights and is anyway replaced by the ordinance,” Rohatgi said.
“Everyone knew the PM’s speech but nobody saw the ordinance coming,” the court said in an oral observation.
In an earlier hearing, the government had sought to argue the case directly without filing a reply to claims made in the petition.
As per its ‘facility for exchange of specified bank notes during the grace period’ notification dated 31 December 2016, the RBI stated that old banknotes could be exchanged only by those who were not in India between 8 November and 31 December 2016.
It also fixed a Rs25,000 cap for non-resident Indians to deposit scrapped currency.
The case will be heard next on 11 April.#casansaar (PTI - LiveMint)
Category : RBI | Comments : 0 | Hits : 464
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments