News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
CVC seeks info from Finmin on SEBI member appointment
The chief vigilance commissioner (CVC) has written to the finance ministry, asking whether vigilance clearance was granted to Prashant Saran, the whole-time member of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi). The said query was on the period when the member’s tenure came up for renewal in 2012.
In the letter, dated October 15, a copy of which is available with Business Standard, the commission has stated that it has received a complaint that Saran’s appointment took place without the clearance from the ministry.
“The Department of Economic Affairs (DEA) is requested to verify all such appointments of whole-time members in Sebi and to confirm that such appointments of whole-time members were made with necessary vigilance clearance,” stated the CVC. An email sent to the Sebi did not elicit any response.
The complaint was first made by Radhey Shyam Agarwal, former senior manager, Bank of Rajasthan. He had alleged that the vigilance clearance was given internally by the then Sebi vigilance officer.
As per the procedures for appointment of chairman and members, vigilance clearance is granted by the concerned ministry. In the case of Sebi, the concerned ministry department is DEA. The CVC and the government have been arguing for over a decade on oversight of regulatory authorities such as Sebi and Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Irdai).
The CVC has since 2004 been seeking from its controlling ministry, the department of personnel and training (DoPT), a list of regulatory bodies under its jurisdiction.
According to the CVC website, the commission has vigilance powers over central government officials, executives in PSUs, banks and insurance companies, and staff of the Reserve Bank of India, NABARD and SIDBI. Quasi-judicial bodies like Irdai, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and Sebi do not figure in the list. But, for now, the issue has been put to rest as recently the two government departments have come to an understanding that Sebi and Irdai are governed by CVC regulations. “Sebi and Irdai appear to be under the impression that they are not subject to CVC jurisdiction. But based on discussion with DEA and department of financial services (DFS) it has been settled that they are also under CVC jurisdiction. We will formalise it shortly, to clear the matter,” said a senior ministry official. (Business Standard)
In the letter, dated October 15, a copy of which is available with Business Standard, the commission has stated that it has received a complaint that Saran’s appointment took place without the clearance from the ministry.
“The Department of Economic Affairs (DEA) is requested to verify all such appointments of whole-time members in Sebi and to confirm that such appointments of whole-time members were made with necessary vigilance clearance,” stated the CVC. An email sent to the Sebi did not elicit any response.
The complaint was first made by Radhey Shyam Agarwal, former senior manager, Bank of Rajasthan. He had alleged that the vigilance clearance was given internally by the then Sebi vigilance officer.
As per the procedures for appointment of chairman and members, vigilance clearance is granted by the concerned ministry. In the case of Sebi, the concerned ministry department is DEA. The CVC and the government have been arguing for over a decade on oversight of regulatory authorities such as Sebi and Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Irdai).
The CVC has since 2004 been seeking from its controlling ministry, the department of personnel and training (DoPT), a list of regulatory bodies under its jurisdiction.
According to the CVC website, the commission has vigilance powers over central government officials, executives in PSUs, banks and insurance companies, and staff of the Reserve Bank of India, NABARD and SIDBI. Quasi-judicial bodies like Irdai, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and Sebi do not figure in the list. But, for now, the issue has been put to rest as recently the two government departments have come to an understanding that Sebi and Irdai are governed by CVC regulations. “Sebi and Irdai appear to be under the impression that they are not subject to CVC jurisdiction. But based on discussion with DEA and department of financial services (DFS) it has been settled that they are also under CVC jurisdiction. We will formalise it shortly, to clear the matter,” said a senior ministry official. (Business Standard)
Category : SEBI | Comments : 0 | Hits : 346
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments