News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
SEBI may take action against companies for not hiring female director
Market regulator Sebi may take action against companies who have not appointed women directors on their boards to meet the requirements of the new Companies Act.
Earlier this week, stock exchanges fined over 500 listed companies who had not complied. "As per the provisions of the Sebi circular, BSE has till date issued advisory letters to 530 companies regarding levy of fines for non-compliance with the said provision within the prescribed timelines," said a statement from BSE. The NSE has fined 260 companies. However, both stock exchanges have not disclosed the names of the firms which were penalised.
There are over 5,700 companies listed on BSE and nearly 3,000 on NSE.
"I hardly believe that in a country like India, companies are not able to find women directors," said Sandeep Parekh, founder of Finsec Law Advisor. He added that though the BSE penalty was a small amount, it could spur promoters to comply with the rule. Last year, capital market regulator Sebi had mandated that listed companies appoint at least one female director on their boards in line with the new Companies Act and to boost gender diversity. It had asked companies to meet its April 1, 2015 deadline or face serious consequences. After some companies failed to comply, Sebi proposed higher fines based on the delay in meeting the requirement.
Last month, the regulator wrote to the cabinet secretary that women directors should be appointed on the boards of public sector undertakings to meet corporate governance norms. Sebi said if a company doesn't complies with its listing agreement rule, which mandates appointment of at least one woman director on the board before June 30, 2015, it would have to pay a fine of Rs 50,000.
Companies complying with this requirement between July 1 and September 30, 2015, would have to cough up Rs 50,000 plus Rs 1,000 per day starting from July 1 till the date of compliance and those entities complying on or after October 1, 2015, would have to pay Rs 1.42 lakh plus Rs 5,000 per day from October 1, 2015, till the date of compliance.
For any non-compliance beyond September 30, 2015, Sebi will take other action against the non-compliant entities, their promoters and/or directors or issue such directions in accordance with law, as considered appropriate, the regulator had said. "It's really unfortunate that several listed companies have failed to appoint women directors despite reminders from market regulators," said Shriram Subramanian, founder and MD, InGovern Research Services. "Unless the market regulator takes stringent action against these companies, they won't be serious in complying with this rule," he added.
India is one of several countries to mandate an appointment of woman directors on the boards of listed companies, but many companies that have complied have female relatives of the promoters in order to comply with the new rules. "On one hand, companies seem to be finding it difficult to find qualified women directors, while on the other there is a concern that with companies appointing women who are merely proxies or name-lenders to ensure compliance, it is likely that Sebi will issue further orders possibly along the lines used to ensure compliance with minimum public holding norms," said Vaneesa Agarwal, a practicing lawyer at the Bombay High Court. (Economic Times)
Earlier this week, stock exchanges fined over 500 listed companies who had not complied. "As per the provisions of the Sebi circular, BSE has till date issued advisory letters to 530 companies regarding levy of fines for non-compliance with the said provision within the prescribed timelines," said a statement from BSE. The NSE has fined 260 companies. However, both stock exchanges have not disclosed the names of the firms which were penalised.
There are over 5,700 companies listed on BSE and nearly 3,000 on NSE.
"I hardly believe that in a country like India, companies are not able to find women directors," said Sandeep Parekh, founder of Finsec Law Advisor. He added that though the BSE penalty was a small amount, it could spur promoters to comply with the rule. Last year, capital market regulator Sebi had mandated that listed companies appoint at least one female director on their boards in line with the new Companies Act and to boost gender diversity. It had asked companies to meet its April 1, 2015 deadline or face serious consequences. After some companies failed to comply, Sebi proposed higher fines based on the delay in meeting the requirement.
Last month, the regulator wrote to the cabinet secretary that women directors should be appointed on the boards of public sector undertakings to meet corporate governance norms. Sebi said if a company doesn't complies with its listing agreement rule, which mandates appointment of at least one woman director on the board before June 30, 2015, it would have to pay a fine of Rs 50,000.
Companies complying with this requirement between July 1 and September 30, 2015, would have to cough up Rs 50,000 plus Rs 1,000 per day starting from July 1 till the date of compliance and those entities complying on or after October 1, 2015, would have to pay Rs 1.42 lakh plus Rs 5,000 per day from October 1, 2015, till the date of compliance.
For any non-compliance beyond September 30, 2015, Sebi will take other action against the non-compliant entities, their promoters and/or directors or issue such directions in accordance with law, as considered appropriate, the regulator had said. "It's really unfortunate that several listed companies have failed to appoint women directors despite reminders from market regulators," said Shriram Subramanian, founder and MD, InGovern Research Services. "Unless the market regulator takes stringent action against these companies, they won't be serious in complying with this rule," he added.
India is one of several countries to mandate an appointment of woman directors on the boards of listed companies, but many companies that have complied have female relatives of the promoters in order to comply with the new rules. "On one hand, companies seem to be finding it difficult to find qualified women directors, while on the other there is a concern that with companies appointing women who are merely proxies or name-lenders to ensure compliance, it is likely that Sebi will issue further orders possibly along the lines used to ensure compliance with minimum public holding norms," said Vaneesa Agarwal, a practicing lawyer at the Bombay High Court. (Economic Times)
Category : SEBI | Comments : 0 | Hits : 428
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments