Order imposing tax on foreign telecom networks may go
The finance ministry is set to withdraw a four-month-old directive that imposed service tax on use of foreign telecom networks.
The directive dealt a blow to the cash flows of IT, IT-enabled services and telecom companies, requiring them to cough up not just the tax dues but also interest for the past period running into crores of rupees.
"We have reviewed the circular... it is being withdrawn," a ministry official said, adding, "A directive to this effect may be issued soon." The levy would have also led to an increase in international telephony charges for domestic consumers.
"Receiving international private leased circuit (IPLC) service from abroad is chargeable to service tax under business support service," the circular issued in August had said.
Most firms in these sectors lease foreign networks to provide services abroad. Leased circuits are covered under telecom services. But as per the Finance Act, a telecom service has to be provided by a person with a licence in India, and since the service provider is located out of country, he could not be taxed under the 'telecom services' head. The circular said though the service could not be taxed as a telecommunication service, it was still liable to tax under business support service.
The move to withdraw the circular follows intense lobbying by industry bodies, such as the NASSCOM.
"The circular on IPLC is bad in law as it creates an aberration in the classification of services...the move (its likely withdrawal) is in the right direction," said Bipin Sapra, partner, Ernst & Young.
Industry had in its representation to the Central Board of Excise and Customs argued that IPLC services were covered by the definition of telecom services. But since foreign telecom service providers do not have a licence under the Indian Telegraph Act, these should not be classified under the business support service, which is a generic service category.
Category : Service Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 468
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments