Service tax on mutual fund distribution to be paid by AMCs
The confusion about service tax on mutual fund distribution has been laid to rest. An advertisement in newspapers on Thursday has finally clarified the position of who should pay service tax on services provided by mutual fund distributors.
The advertisement issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs states that mutual fund agents and distributors do not have the liability to pay service tax, rather the liability to pay is on mutual fund and asset management companies.
Mint spoke to an official at the service tax commissioner’s office in Delhi, who clarified that the advertisement has been issued as a public awareness initiative and added that the position on this matter was clarified sometime ago through a notification. The official requested that he not be named.
This year’s Union budget saw the service tax exemption being removed for mutual fund distribution. Subsequently, a circular was issued which clarified that the levy would be on the basis of reverse charge—which means that the investor doesn’t have to bear this cost.
Since then, there has been a debate within the mutual fund industry on whether the asset manager will bear the cost or the distributor will absorb it in the commission itself. This means that at the time of paying the commission to the distributor, the asset management company could deduct the service tax and pay the net amount. The increased service tax levy at 14% from the earlier 12.36% made matters worse.
Distributors were upset with this provision as it meant a direct blow to their margins.
The advertisement has taken asset management companies by surprise, as they haven’t received any direct communication from tax authorities. A senior official from a large asset management company said, “AMFI (Association of Mutual Funds of India) is trying to connect with CBDT (Central Board of Direct Taxes) on this matter.”
It remains to be seen who will finally bear the additional cost of the service tax. (LiveMint)
Category : Service Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 813
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments