CA Sansaar
- All Categories
- Income Tax (1616)
- Students (768)
- Service Tax (497)
- Corporate Law (462)
- Audit (393)
- Accounts (336)
- VAT (277)
- GST (136)
- Finance (110)
- Excise (106)
- Banking (46)
- FEMA (40)
- Custom (29)
- Shares & Stock (18)
- IFRS (17)
- Income Tax Software (4)
- Cost Inflation Index (1)
Recent
- What Documents Are Required for ITR Filing?
- How to File Income Tax Return Online?
- Managing personal finance
- Managing personal finance
- How can beginners start managing their personal finances effectively?
- How can beginners start managing their personal finances effectively?
- How can beginners start managing their personal finances effectively?
- What is Union Budget 2026-27?
- Test
- 26QB Challan
- Cash amount deposit in bank account as on dt:31-03-24
- branch statutory Audit
- Tax Liability on payment of Gratuity
- Using the work orders of another entity
- Capitalisation of Assets in case of housing society
- GSTR 9 ITC Reversal
- Reissue Refund of Closed Partnership Firm
- section 43B(h)
- TCS os sale of Fly Ash
- Limit of cash on hand sec 44ad person
- STATUTORY AUDIT
- Long term capital gain
- Un secured loans hug amount sec 68 provision applicable
- Resume Upload
- Cash balance increased options
- FOREX FFMC GSTR-1
- missing turnover show in next quater or drc-03 pay correct procedure
- Banking
- Gift transactions from relatives allowed different dates
- TALLY EXCEL IMPORT
- Income Tax
- Empanelment ewnewal fees
- Tax Audit in case of Pvt. Ltd. Company
- ITC from ISD wrongly reflecting in System generated annual GSTR 3B
- Pf and esi subscription amounts late payments claim eligible and provision compulsory
- GST Applicability
- Loans credit and debit adjustment entry allowed in it act
- Tax audit or itr-3 filed f.y.22-23
- Gst returns nil filed cash deposit in bank account
- Cash limit question
Q. > Please Help: Cenvat credit
Service tax charged on monthly payment of non-comprehensive AMC of office computers, printers,networks and servers is eligible for cenvat under excise??
Experts Panelist
Rambabu Senkarasetti
Accounts, Audit, Corporate Law, Finance, Income Tax, Service Tax, Students, VAT
Answers Posted : 409
CA Satuti Mahajan
Accounts, Audit, Corporate Law, Custom, Excise, FEMA, Finance, GST, IFRS, Income Tax, Service Tax, Shares & Stock, Students, VAT
Answers Posted : 291
Vikash Kumar Jha
Accounts, Audit, Banking, Corporate Law, Custom, Excise, FEMA, Finance, GST, IFRS, Income Tax, Service Tax, Shares & Stock, Students, VAT
Answers Posted : 270
Rishabh Upadhyay
Accounts, Audit, Corporate Law, Custom, Excise, FEMA, Finance, IFRS, Income Tax, Service Tax, Shares & Stock, Students, VAT
Answers Posted : 257
Ashish Karundia
Accounts, Audit, Corporate Law, Custom, Excise, FEMA, Finance, Income Tax, Service Tax, Students, VAT
Answers Posted : 257
Mrattunjay
Accounts, Corporate Law, Custom, Excise, FEMA, Finance, GST, IFRS, Income Tax, Service Tax, Shares & Stock, Students, VAT
Answers Posted : 220
PRIYANKA
Accounts, Audit, Corporate Law, Excise, Finance, Income Tax, Service Tax, Shares & Stock, Students, VAT
Answers Posted : 136
CA. SURESH Kr. AGARWAL
Accounts, Audit, Corporate Law, Custom, Excise, FEMA, Finance, GST, IFRS, Income Tax, Service Tax, Shares & Stock, Students, VAT
Answers Posted : 131
Vaneet Gupta
Accounts, Audit, Corporate Law, Custom, Excise, FEMA, Finance, IFRS, Income Tax, Service Tax, Shares & Stock, Students, VAT
Answers Posted : 120
Ketan Samdani
Accounts, Audit, Corporate Law, Excise, Finance, GST, Income Tax, Service Tax, Students, VAT
Answers Posted : 117
4856
QUESTIONS
4692
ANSWERS
807
EXPERTS
2701
QUERIST
Comments
Manish Kr.
12-Apr-2015 , 04:02:14 pmYes Cestat, Bangalore Bench ADC India Communications Ltd. versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore FINAL ORDER NOS. 286 & 287 OF 2012 APPEAL NOS. E/2180 & 2181 OF 2010 6. As regards the AMC for computers, it is the claim of the appellant that these computers were used for manifold purposes in connection with manufacture and clearance of their products. The learned counsel submits that this fact was not disputed at the lower levels. The learned Superintendent (AR) fairly concedes this position. It appears from the records that a certain part of the CENVAT credit taken on AMC for computers was reversed by the appellant accepting the fact that this much credit was not used in connection with manufacture or clearance of their products. As regards the remaining part of the credit, as already noted, there is no rebuttal of the requisite nexus with the manufacture/clearance of excisable goods. If that be so, the challenge in relation to AMC for computers also must succeed.