CA Sansaar
- All Categories
- Income Tax (1614)
- Students (768)
- Service Tax (497)
- Corporate Law (462)
- Audit (393)
- Accounts (336)
- VAT (277)
- GST (136)
- Excise (106)
- Finance (105)
- Banking (46)
- FEMA (40)
- Custom (29)
- Shares & Stock (18)
- IFRS (17)
- Income Tax Software (4)
- Cost Inflation Index (1)
Recent
- What is Union Budget 2026-27?
- Test
- 26QB Challan
- Cash amount deposit in bank account as on dt:31-03-24
- branch statutory Audit
- Tax Liability on payment of Gratuity
- Using the work orders of another entity
- Capitalisation of Assets in case of housing society
- GSTR 9 ITC Reversal
- Reissue Refund of Closed Partnership Firm
- section 43B(h)
- TCS os sale of Fly Ash
- Limit of cash on hand sec 44ad person
- STATUTORY AUDIT
- Long term capital gain
- Un secured loans hug amount sec 68 provision applicable
- Resume Upload
- Cash balance increased options
- FOREX FFMC GSTR-1
- missing turnover show in next quater or drc-03 pay correct procedure
- Banking
- Gift transactions from relatives allowed different dates
- TALLY EXCEL IMPORT
- Income Tax
- Empanelment ewnewal fees
- Tax Audit in case of Pvt. Ltd. Company
- ITC from ISD wrongly reflecting in System generated annual GSTR 3B
- Pf and esi subscription amounts late payments claim eligible and provision compulsory
- GST Applicability
- Loans credit and debit adjustment entry allowed in it act
- Tax audit or itr-3 filed f.y.22-23
- Gst returns nil filed cash deposit in bank account
- Cash limit question
- TDS
- Income from AIF Mutual Fund-Under Section-115UA & 115UB.
- Income Tax
- Audit
- audit
- Income Tax
- TDS on provision of audit fees
Q. > Please Help: Delay in filing of Form-23B
If there is delay in filing of Form-23B by statutory auditor, whether penalty under section-629A will be attracted or in any other section? If penalty is attracted then what is the procedure for payment or ROC will intimate the same.
answered Nov 10, 2011 by PRIYANKA , GREATER NOIDA
I agree with Mr. Unmesh, as normally it is not seen that penalty is levied for non furnishing of form 23B, but, nowadays, as there has come wide changes in functioning of ROC ,Recently it is heard, that notices are sent to some CA Firms from ROC, for giving explaination for using SRN No. Z999999 for filing form Form 23AC, and being asked that why form 23b was not filed by them, so Nowadays it is advisable to file form 23B with ROC ASAP, without delay., And as asked by you, about the penalty procedure, i think that u will get to know about the same, only after u recieve a notice from ROC regarding the same, There is no other way to know about the penalty, as even no time is prescribed for filing the form 23b with ROC till now.
answered Jul 03, 2012 by Rambabu Senkarasetti , Guntur
answered Jul 03, 2012 by Rambabu Senkarasetti , Guntur
answered Jul 03, 2012 by Rambabu Senkarasetti , Guntur
I agree with above answer.
Experts Panelist
Comments
Unmesh
03-Nov-2011 , 06:40:06 pmI have never seen any case where penalty for this default being initiated by the ROC, Normally if form 23B could not be filed in time CA's dont file this form and they usually use Z99999999 as default SRN no. in annual filing, although if you want to file this form i will suggest you should file the form and wait for the action from ROC end.
ASHWIN GALA
27-Nov-2011 , 12:26:39 pm1.AS PER SEC. 224(1A) OF THE COMPANIES ACT FORM 23B IS TO BE SUBMITTED BY AUDITOR TO ROC WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF APPOINTMENT. 2.BUT ROC IS ALLOWING EVEN IF YOU HAVE NOT FILED FORM 23B. 3.IN FACT THERE ARE CASES THAT ONE CA HAS FILED FORM 23B & STATUTORY AUDIT IS CONDUCTED & SIGNED BY OTHER CA & 23AC HAS BEEN FILED. IN E-FILING THERE IS NO CROSS CHECK. 4. LAST WEEK IN A MEETING WITH ROC HE CONFIRMED THE ABOVE FACT.