- All Categories
- Income Tax (1614)
- Students (768)
- Service Tax (497)
- Corporate Law (462)
- Audit (393)
- Accounts (336)
- VAT (277)
- GST (136)
- Excise (106)
- Finance (104)
- Banking (46)
- FEMA (40)
- Custom (29)
- Shares & Stock (18)
- IFRS (17)
- Income Tax Software (4)
- Cost Inflation Index (1)
Recent
- Test
- 26QB Challan
- Cash amount deposit in bank account as on dt:31-03-24
- branch statutory Audit
- Tax Liability on payment of Gratuity
- Using the work orders of another entity
- Capitalisation of Assets in case of housing society
- GSTR 9 ITC Reversal
- Reissue Refund of Closed Partnership Firm
- section 43B(h)
- TCS os sale of Fly Ash
- Limit of cash on hand sec 44ad person
- STATUTORY AUDIT
- Long term capital gain
- Un secured loans hug amount sec 68 provision applicable
- Resume Upload
- Cash balance increased options
- FOREX FFMC GSTR-1
- missing turnover show in next quater or drc-03 pay correct procedure
- Banking
- Gift transactions from relatives allowed different dates
- TALLY EXCEL IMPORT
- Income Tax
- Empanelment ewnewal fees
- Tax Audit in case of Pvt. Ltd. Company
- ITC from ISD wrongly reflecting in System generated annual GSTR 3B
- Pf and esi subscription amounts late payments claim eligible and provision compulsory
- GST Applicability
- Loans credit and debit adjustment entry allowed in it act
- Tax audit or itr-3 filed f.y.22-23
- Gst returns nil filed cash deposit in bank account
- Cash limit question
- TDS
- Income from AIF Mutual Fund-Under Section-115UA & 115UB.
- Income Tax
- Audit
- audit
- Income Tax
- TDS on provision of audit fees
- Business loan from bank how much amount available
4848
QUESTIONS
4692
ANSWERS
807
EXPERTS
2698
QUERIST


Comments
Piyush Laddha
10-Jan-2015 , 06:58:20 pmNo, It will not come under the perview of Section 40 A(3) because the company has not paid any payment, it is advance only and voucher of employee will be also in part only.
Y.K.Bhushan
14-Jan-2015 , 10:12:14 amNo in fact it is not a expense , it is an advance only
m r gopal
14-Jan-2015 , 11:52:00 amsince this is only an advance and has not crystalised into expenditure provision of sec 40(a)(3) may not be attracted
Ashish Jain
14-Jan-2015 , 03:52:53 pmNo, it is not in nature of expense
ashish shah
14-Jan-2015 , 06:23:56 pmit will result in book adjustment and finally expense will be debited which is exception as mentioned in rule 6DD(d).
Neeraj Trivedi
14-Jan-2015 , 08:10:31 pmTake Tour advance as Short term advances and when actual expense is known put the expenses entry in pl and cancel the advance with it...and by doing this sec-40a3 would not be affected as the expenditure is not charge to pl
Neeraj Trivedi
14-Jan-2015 , 08:16:07 pmthe last line i want to amend.. and by doing this sec-40a3 would not be affected as the advance not yet charged to pl..
Geetika Mittal
12-Feb-2015 , 07:17:31 amThanks everyone for your clear and valued comments..